New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Inconsistency in ETag handling #155
Comments
The last sentence was suggested by a directorate review, so I would be prone to keep it as it is. How about the following text?
|
I'm not sure. If the server supports ICE restarts and the client doesn't, then the session doesn't support ICE restarts, but sending If-Match is required.
It's up to you, of course, but I believe it's grammatically incorrect. |
Yes, that's correct, the client always has to send the Etag |
Could you please make that explicit in the text? |
In fact, this is wrong, as the WHIP session may also send the entity-tag even if it doesn't support ICE restarts (it is OPTIONAL). So it should be something like:
|
Agreed. |
Section 4.1.2:
However, if the server does not support ICE restarts, then there might be no entity tag. Section 4.1.1:
(By the way, the grammar of this last clause seems off to my untrained eyes.)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: