Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify route precedence in routing.mdx #6545

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

mb21
Copy link

@mb21 mb21 commented Jan 23, 2024

Description (required)

  • Clarify what "them" and "in order" exactly refer to.
  • "Routes with ... will take precedence over less specific routes" -> seems like a circular definition, since "precedence" and "specificity" seem to refer to the same thing here...

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 23, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Updated (UTC)
docs 🛑 Canceled (Inspect) Jan 23, 2024 9:18am

@astrobot-houston
Copy link
Contributor

Hello! Thank you for opening your first PR to Astro’s Docs! 🎉

Here’s what will happen next:

  1. Our GitHub bots will run to check your changes.
    If they spot any broken links you will see some error messages on this PR.
    Don’t hesitate to ask any questions if you’re not sure what these mean!

  2. In a few minutes, you’ll be able to see a preview of your changes on Vercel 🥳

  3. One or more of our maintainers will take a look and may ask you to make changes.
    We try to be responsive, but don’t worry if this takes a few days.

@sarah11918
Copy link
Member

Docs is happy with the existing wording here!

@sarah11918 sarah11918 closed this Jan 25, 2024
@mb21
Copy link
Author

mb21 commented Jan 26, 2024

Any rationale? Maybe you wanna take a look at how many people are confused about this, e.g. in withastro/astro#9757

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants