You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While "good" and "bad" are useful classes for training, there's no real reason why we couldn't create additional classifications that are automatically categorized - e.g. "solvent peak" or "only in standards". Not sure how well the med_snr and med_cor metrics alone would be able to separate these but with additional ones (maybe sample_type?) this should be totally doable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I wonder if the best way to go about this is to have the user supply the regression formula? Like the default would be feat_class~med_cor+med_snr but there's no reason we should ban the user from providing their own. Would require a bunch of error handling but doesn't actually feel that difficult.
While "good" and "bad" are useful classes for training, there's no real reason why we couldn't create additional classifications that are automatically categorized - e.g. "solvent peak" or "only in standards". Not sure how well the med_snr and med_cor metrics alone would be able to separate these but with additional ones (maybe sample_type?) this should be totally doable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: