Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SSC precision #1

Closed
sgbstats opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

SSC precision #1

sgbstats opened this issue Sep 2, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@sgbstats
Copy link

sgbstats commented Sep 2, 2022

Hi,

I noticed an annoying ambiguity on your sample size calculator. Where you have the precision+/- expected, it reads as if it is asking for the width on either side of the expected value rather than the total CI width. I tested the inputs against a couple of the values in the table for Buderer and I am sure that that box is asking for the total width. I think it would be useful to make it clear what the input is, maybe CI width rather than +/-.

Hope this is useful, I think your calculator is a good resource.

@wnarifin
Copy link
Owner

Hi,

Thank you for the feedback. In the calculator, +/- stands for the precision (i.e. the distance/margin of error on either side of the estimate), i.e. CI = estimate +/- precision, where precision = z(1-alpha/2) x SE.

In Buderer, she used the term "width W" in a rather confusing way as W refers to precision. In general statistical term, width should refer to (upper CI limit - lower CI limit), i.e. 2 x precision/distance for a symmetrical distribution, while she defined length = 2 x width/precision/distance. So, for the calculator, I use W to mean precision (or width in Buderer's term), not total width (or length). The value "95% CI Width of 10%" in the titles of Table 3 and 4 should mean precision (the value +/- estimate) of 0.1, i.e. estimate +/- 0.1 given its use in the paper.

I hope that clears the confusion. Again thank you for using and testing the SSC, let me know if you have any other suggestions.

Best regards.

@wnarifin wnarifin closed this as completed Nov 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants