Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Suggestion] Easier Evolve (Color-code evolvable and display how much you can evolve) #44

Closed
OSwoboda opened this issue Aug 4, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@OSwoboda
Copy link

OSwoboda commented Aug 4, 2016

  1. Additionally to Candies and how many Candies are needed to Evolve, it would be nice to display how many of that Pokémon could be evolved.
  2. Option to select the amount of Pokémon of one kind that can be evolved with lowest CP/IV (needs Selection Checkboxes #24 to be implemeted first)
@JaymerJaymer
Copy link

... to help with determining which CAN evolve, adding a small color icon next to the QtyCandiesOwned would help.

I sort my list by IV%, then Name, then To_Evolve

I scroll down past the 0's, and then work my way examining each to see if Candy > Evolve.

A simple color marker right there would help.

thx

@Wolfsblvt
Copy link
Owner

Sounds like a good idea. But guess that have to wait until we rework the table a bit to make it color-coded.

@Wolfsblvt Wolfsblvt changed the title [Suggestion] Easier Evolve [Suggestion] Easier Evolve (Color-code evolvable and display how much you can evolve) Aug 5, 2016
@ghost ghost added this to the v0.2.0 milestone Aug 7, 2016
@ferazambuja
Copy link

Maybe add two columns for now. "How many evolves you can do" and "count of how many of that species.

Name IV. Candy. Evolves Count
Pidgey 83% 16 1 3
Pidgey 50% 16 1 3
Pidgey 40% 16 1 3

@Wolfsblvt
Copy link
Owner

This suggestion will continue in #123. We should just keep one issue for that.

@Wolfsblvt Wolfsblvt removed this from the v0.2.0 milestone Sep 15, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants