Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Auxiliary loss weight #3

Closed
Yibin122 opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Auxiliary loss weight #3

Yibin122 opened this issue Apr 27, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@Yibin122
Copy link

Yibin122 commented Apr 27, 2022 •
edited
Loading

I noticed 0.2 is used in your code here. But its set as 1.0 in paper. I guess the balancing effect of using 0.2 is better. But how different would the results be?
@568xiaoma
Copy link
Collaborator

The weight of auxiliary loss have little effect on the results.
We did not conduct more experiments to investigate the effect of loss weights on the results.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@568xiaoma @Yibin122