'json' feature should be called serde and serde-json should not be a dependency

[barafael]

Hi, thanks for this crate, it's got great potential!

I don't quite understand the json feature. The way I think it is done:

The json feature enables dependencies for serde and serde-json. In the code, the serializers/deserializers are derived via serde, if the json feature is enabled. The serde-json crate is not actually used.

Here is how this could be done better (I tested locally):
The serde feature enables a dependency on serde with the derive feature, as before. In the code, the serializers/deserializers are derived, as before. The serde-json crate appears nowhere.

I think this is the conventional and idiomatic way to do this. Are there things I am overlooking here?

EDIT: renamed, was "'json' feature seems half baked" which is vague and unnecessarily insulting. Sorry :)

[wooorm]

Hi!

Feel free to continue baking it :) I haven’t used it myself yet

See also:

• Can't deserialize mdast #56
• Should json be default feature ? #47
• Fix to add features: 'derive' for serde #45
• Add support for serializing trees as JSON #37

[wooorm]

Solved in bbb3119