Add support for Fiber.try(_)

[mode777]

I noticed that wren has Fiber.call(_) but not Fiber.try(_). I needed this because I want to pass cancellation tokens to Fibers. Implementation is straightforward. Honestly I think it just was forgotten. I added an additional test try_value.wren

[avivbeeri]

I think this PR implementation looks good. Don't forget to add documentation for the new version of Fiber.try(_).

[mode777]

I think this PR implementation looks good. Don't forget to add documentation for the new version of Fiber.try(_).

Done.

[avivbeeri]

I assume it's fine, but is the argument passed to try(_) available if the fiber yields/suspends, and is then resumed?

[ChayimFriedman2]

Yes, just like call(_).

[mode777]

I assume it's fine, but is the argument passed to try(_) available if the fiber yields/suspends, and is then resumed?

Yes, I added another test to show that. In the implementation call() call(_) and try() all just call runFiber so there should be no difference.

[ruby0x1]

@mode777 don't forget you can add yourself to AUTHORS file in a separate PR.

Also note you generally want to PR from a branch (and not main branch), so that you can have more than one PR open and not be blocked from changing main. When you change the branch on your end, changes end up here in the PR which isn't what you want.

[mode777]

@mode777 don't forget you can add yourself to AUTHORS file in a separate PR.

Also note you generally want to PR from a branch (and not main branch), so that you can have more than one PR open and not be blocked from changing main. When you change the branch on your end, changes end up here in the PR which isn't what you want.

yep, I noticed that too - I was actually waiting for this to get merged so I can have a look at some other things.