Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate using plausible for analytics #1871

Open
plaindocs opened this issue Jan 11, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Investigate using plausible for analytics #1871

plaindocs opened this issue Jan 11, 2023 · 5 comments

Comments

@plaindocs
Copy link
Contributor

instead of GA

CC @ericholscher @mxsasha

@ericholscher
Copy link
Member

I'm 👍 on this, or we could just remove analytics? I think the only thing we really use it for is the annual stats heh.

@mxsasha
Copy link
Contributor

mxsasha commented Jan 12, 2023

Haven't tried it but looks good, I've also seen matamo.org as a GA alternative. Seems both are $19/mo at our size, may be not worth it for just the stats post. Don't we also use the numbers for ad sales though?

@plaindocs
Copy link
Contributor Author

I feel that some kind of analytics would is good for things like job-board?

I'm -1 on Matomo after using it at $oldjob

@ericholscher
Copy link
Member

Yea, plausible is pretty nice. It's basic, but does the job and easy to use. We're using it on RTD and I like it.

In terms of the website sponsorship, we do actually get view stats from the ads, which is another way we could get some of this data, but that doesn't include conf sites, etc.

I'm not sure if the job board would support third-party JS integration. I do know it has native GA support, because everything does 🙃

@plaindocs
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yeah, I think it would be interesting to track some really basic page views, and see how we go.
One of us could look at basic reports, or we could ask @goatlady to cook some up sporadically.

Could try it for six months and turn it off if it's not useful?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants