Skip to content

Proper experimental design can help us find optimal conditions efficiently. Response surface methodology with central composite design has been applied in this project to find optimal combinations of conditions for expected outcomes

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

wuyueliuye/experimental-design

Repository files navigation

experimental-design

central composite in experimental design - response surface model

Introduction

Aim of the study

There're tradeoffs among TiN peeling, tungsten film uniformity and tungsten film stress, where uniformity and stress were founded to be controlled by both pressure and H_2/WF_6 ratio, while the happening of peeling were impacted by ratio. Here in this study, the response surface methodology with central composite design has been applied, intend to find optimal combinations of pressure and ratio to minimize uniformity and stress, as well as avoid TiN peeling.

Variables:

-- pressure: covariate, quantitative variable, ranges from 4 to 80

-- ratio: covariate, quantitative variable, ranges from 2 to 10

-- stress: quantitative variable, performing as response to be minimized

-- uniformity: quantitative variable, performing as response to be minimized

-- peeling: categorical variable, performing as response to represent the happenness of TiN peeling

Experimental Design

-- Central composite design

The design of experiments follows central composite design, where there're 4 factorial points, 4 star points as well as 3 center points, with $\alpha=\sqrt2$, therefore a rotatable design.

image

Methodology

Quardic Response Surface Model

-- Response surface model is to explore the relationship between several exploratory variables and on or more response variables. Where the main idea is to use a sequence of designed experiments to obtain an optimal response, therefore can be used to optimize a process. While the quardic response surface model is to include both first order of predictors and quardic polynomial terms of predictors into a regression model.

image

Model Assumptions

-- Similar to regression models, the response surface model assumes normality, independency and constant variance of error term

-- The response surface model assumes that all exploratory varibles are significant

-- A quardic response always has a stationary point, which can be either a min/max or saddle point

Analysis Plan

-- The design of experiments follows the central composite design. From the dataset, we can find that there're 4 factorial points, 4 star points and 3 center point, where the $\alpha=\sqrt2$, thus rotatable.

-- Fit two quardic response surface regression models with covariates pressure and ratio, where one it stress response and the other is for uniformity. Visualize the contours for stress and uniformity to find optimial combinations of pressure and ratio to minimize the stress and the uniformity.

-- Add three more data points into the exprimental design, then fit a classification model for peeling status with covariates pressure and ratio, find threshold of the classification model using linear discriminant analysis.

References

Central Composite Design

Discriminant Analysis

RSM in R

RSM in R

About

Proper experimental design can help us find optimal conditions efficiently. Response surface methodology with central composite design has been applied in this project to find optimal combinations of conditions for expected outcomes

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages