-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Trace Over System Calls Not Working #3123
Comments
This functionality was removed because specific commands were added to step to the next user/system instruction. This functionality hasn't been added to the trace UI yet. Likely the implementation would be a new |
I am quite interested in this project and here's my idea
|
The key issue with that idea is that control flow might reach user code while running the system function (most notably for callbacks). To solve this issue it’s enough to reuse the existing stepping functionality and expose it to the user as I explained in my previous comment. |
main: This is a script I wrote hoping to skip the system call but the f2 breakpoint I set after running it won't break |
Operating System
Windows 11
x64dbg Version
latest
Describe the issue
Now that the switch condition is gone from trace into window, please post some instructions on how to trace over system calls. Tried various examples from internet and nothing worked. What is the equivalent of mod.party(dis.branchdest(cip)) ==1 which worked perfectly. Why was this option removed?
Steps to reproduce
Attachments
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: