Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
commit 4ca8e03 upstream.

If we do fast tree logging we increment a counter on the current
transaction for every ordered extent we need to wait for.  This means we
expect the transaction to still be there when we clear pending on the
ordered extent.  However if we happen to abort the transaction and clean
it up, there could be no running transaction, and thus we'll trip the
"ASSERT(trans)" check.  This is obviously incorrect, and the code
properly deals with the case that the transaction doesn't exist.  Fix
this ASSERT() to only fire if there's no trans and we don't have
BTRFS_FS_ERROR() set on the file system.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
  • Loading branch information
josefbacik authored and gregkh committed Sep 23, 2023
1 parent 6fdce81 commit 02614f5
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion fs/btrfs/ordered-data.c
Expand Up @@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ void btrfs_remove_ordered_extent(struct btrfs_inode *btrfs_inode,
refcount_inc(&trans->use_count);
spin_unlock(&fs_info->trans_lock);

ASSERT(trans);
ASSERT(trans || BTRFS_FS_ERROR(fs_info));
if (trans) {
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&trans->pending_ordered))
wake_up(&trans->pending_wait);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 02614f5

Please sign in to comment.