mptcp: process pending subflow error on close

[ Upstream commit 9f1a988 ]

On incoming TCP reset, subflow closing could happen before error
propagation. That in turn could cause the socket error being ignored,
and a missing socket state transition, as reported by Daire-Byrne.

Address the issues explicitly checking for subflow socket error at
close time. To avoid code duplication, factor-out of __mptcp_error_report()
a new helper implementing the relevant bits.

Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#429
Fixes: 15cc104 ("mptcp: deliver ssk errors to msk")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <martineau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>

net/mptcp/protocol.c

@@ -765,40 +765,44 @@ static bool __mptcp_ofo_queue(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 	return moved;
 }
 
-void __mptcp_error_report(struct sock *sk)
+static bool __mptcp_subflow_error_report(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk)
 {
-	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
-	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+	int err = sock_error(ssk);
+	int ssk_state;
 
-	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
-		struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
-		int err = sock_error(ssk);
-		int ssk_state;
+	if (!err)
+		return false;
 
-		if (!err)
-			continue;
+	/* only propagate errors on fallen-back sockets or
+	 * on MPC connect
+	 */
+	if (sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_SENT && !__mptcp_check_fallback(mptcp_sk(sk)))
+		return false;
 
-		/* only propagate errors on fallen-back sockets or
-		 * on MPC connect
-		 */
-		if (sk->sk_state != TCP_SYN_SENT && !__mptcp_check_fallback(msk))
-			continue;
+	/* We need to propagate only transition to CLOSE state.
+	 * Orphaned socket will see such state change via
+	 * subflow_sched_work_if_closed() and that path will properly
+	 * destroy the msk as needed.
+	 */
+	ssk_state = inet_sk_state_load(ssk);
+	if (ssk_state == TCP_CLOSE && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
+		inet_sk_state_store(sk, ssk_state);
+	WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_err, -err);
 
-		/* We need to propagate only transition to CLOSE state.
-		 * Orphaned socket will see such state change via
-		 * subflow_sched_work_if_closed() and that path will properly
-		 * destroy the msk as needed.
-		 */
-		ssk_state = inet_sk_state_load(ssk);
-		if (ssk_state == TCP_CLOSE && !sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DEAD))
-			inet_sk_state_store(sk, ssk_state);
-		WRITE_ONCE(sk->sk_err, -err);
-
-		/* This barrier is coupled with smp_rmb() in mptcp_poll() */
-		smp_wmb();
-		sk_error_report(sk);
-		break;
-	}
+	/* This barrier is coupled with smp_rmb() in mptcp_poll() */
+	smp_wmb();
+	sk_error_report(sk);
+	return true;
+}
+
+void __mptcp_error_report(struct sock *sk)
+{
+	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+	struct mptcp_sock *msk = mptcp_sk(sk);
+
+	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow)
+		if (__mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow)))
+			break;
 }
 
 /* In most cases we will be able to lock the mptcp socket.  If its already
@@ -2446,6 +2450,7 @@ static void __mptcp_close_ssk(struct sock *sk, struct sock *ssk,
 	}
 
 out_release:
+	__mptcp_subflow_error_report(sk, ssk);
 	release_sock(ssk);
 
 	sock_put(ssk);