Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
soundwire: bus: fix confusion on device used by pm_runtime
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
[ Upstream commit 973794e ]

Intel stress-tests routinely report IO timeouts and invalid power
management transitions. Upon further analysis, we seem to be using the
wrong devices in pm_runtime calls.

Before reading and writing registers, we first need to make sure the
Slave is fully resumed. The existing code attempts to do such that,
however because of a confusion dating from 2017 and copy/paste, we
end-up resuming the parent only instead of resuming the codec device.

This can lead to accesses to the Slave registers while the bus is
still being configured and the Slave not enumerated, and as a result
IO errors occur.

This is a classic problem, similar confusions happened for HDaudio
between bus and codec device, leading to power management issues.

Fix by using the relevant device for all uses of pm_runtime functions.

Fixes: 60ee9be ('soundwire: bus: add PM/no-PM versions of read/write functions')
Fixes: aa79293 ('soundwire: bus: fix io error when processing alert event')
Fixes: 9d715fa ('soundwire: Add IO transfer')
Reported-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rander Wang <rander.wang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210122070634.12825-9-yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
  • Loading branch information
plbossart authored and gregkh committed Mar 4, 2021
1 parent a0f1610 commit 624bbb9
Showing 1 changed file with 9 additions and 9 deletions.
18 changes: 9 additions & 9 deletions drivers/soundwire/bus.c
Expand Up @@ -513,16 +513,16 @@ int sdw_nread(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, u8 *val)
{
int ret;

ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(slave->bus->dev);
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&slave->dev);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES) {
pm_runtime_put_noidle(slave->bus->dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(&slave->dev);
return ret;
}

ret = sdw_nread_no_pm(slave, addr, count, val);

pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(slave->bus->dev);
pm_runtime_put(slave->bus->dev);
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&slave->dev);
pm_runtime_put(&slave->dev);

return ret;
}
Expand All @@ -539,16 +539,16 @@ int sdw_nwrite(struct sdw_slave *slave, u32 addr, size_t count, u8 *val)
{
int ret;

ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(slave->bus->dev);
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&slave->dev);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES) {
pm_runtime_put_noidle(slave->bus->dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(&slave->dev);
return ret;
}

ret = sdw_nwrite_no_pm(slave, addr, count, val);

pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(slave->bus->dev);
pm_runtime_put(slave->bus->dev);
pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(&slave->dev);
pm_runtime_put(&slave->dev);

return ret;
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1453,7 +1453,7 @@ static int sdw_handle_slave_alerts(struct sdw_slave *slave)
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&slave->dev);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES) {
dev_err(&slave->dev, "Failed to resume device: %d\n", ret);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(slave->bus->dev);
pm_runtime_put_noidle(&slave->dev);
return ret;
}

Expand Down

0 comments on commit 624bbb9

Please sign in to comment.