Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
netfilter: nft_compat: make sure xtables destructors have run
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
[ Upstream commit ffe8923 ]

Pablo Neira found that after recent update of xt_IDLETIMER the
iptables-nft tests sometimes show an error.

He tracked this down to the delayed cleanup used by nf_tables core:
del rule (transaction A)
add rule (transaction B)

Its possible that by time transaction B (both in same netns) runs,
the xt target destructor has not been invoked yet.

For native nft expressions this is no problem because all expressions
that have such side effects make sure these are handled from the commit
phase, rather than async cleanup.

For nft_compat however this isn't true.

Instead of forcing synchronous behaviour for nft_compat, keep track
of the number of outstanding destructor calls.

When we attempt to create a new expression, flush the cleanup worker
to make sure destructors have completed.

With lots of help from Pablo Neira.

Reported-by: Pablo Neira Ayso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
  • Loading branch information
Florian Westphal authored and gregkh committed Dec 30, 2020
1 parent b17244c commit 810bc55
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 3 changed files with 42 additions and 6 deletions.
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions include/net/netfilter/nf_tables.h
Expand Up @@ -1462,4 +1462,6 @@ void nft_chain_filter_fini(void);

void __init nft_chain_route_init(void);
void nft_chain_route_fini(void);

void nf_tables_trans_destroy_flush_work(void);
#endif /* _NET_NF_TABLES_H */
10 changes: 8 additions & 2 deletions net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
Expand Up @@ -6605,6 +6605,12 @@ static void nf_tables_trans_destroy_work(struct work_struct *w)
}
}

void nf_tables_trans_destroy_flush_work(void)
{
flush_work(&trans_destroy_work);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nf_tables_trans_destroy_flush_work);

static int nf_tables_commit_chain_prepare(struct net *net, struct nft_chain *chain)
{
struct nft_rule *rule;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -6776,9 +6782,9 @@ static void nf_tables_commit_release(struct net *net)
spin_unlock(&nf_tables_destroy_list_lock);

nf_tables_module_autoload_cleanup(net);
mutex_unlock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);

schedule_work(&trans_destroy_work);

mutex_unlock(&net->nft.commit_mutex);
}

static int nf_tables_commit(struct net *net, struct sk_buff *skb)
Expand Down
36 changes: 32 additions & 4 deletions net/netfilter/nft_compat.c
Expand Up @@ -27,6 +27,8 @@ struct nft_xt_match_priv {
void *info;
};

static refcount_t nft_compat_pending_destroy = REFCOUNT_INIT(1);

static int nft_compat_chain_validate_dependency(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const char *tablename)
{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -236,6 +238,15 @@ nft_target_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,

nft_target_set_tgchk_param(&par, ctx, target, info, &e, proto, inv);

/* xtables matches or targets can have side effects, e.g.
* creation/destruction of /proc files.
* The xt ->destroy functions are run asynchronously from
* work queue. If we have pending invocations we thus
* need to wait for those to finish.
*/
if (refcount_read(&nft_compat_pending_destroy) > 1)
nf_tables_trans_destroy_flush_work();

ret = xt_check_target(&par, size, proto, inv);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
Expand All @@ -247,6 +258,13 @@ nft_target_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,
return 0;
}

static void __nft_mt_tg_destroy(struct module *me, const struct nft_expr *expr)
{
refcount_dec(&nft_compat_pending_destroy);
module_put(me);
kfree(expr->ops);
}

static void
nft_target_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr)
{
Expand All @@ -262,8 +280,7 @@ nft_target_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr)
if (par.target->destroy != NULL)
par.target->destroy(&par);

module_put(me);
kfree(expr->ops);
__nft_mt_tg_destroy(me, expr);
}

static int nft_extension_dump_info(struct sk_buff *skb, int attr,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -494,8 +511,7 @@ __nft_match_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, const struct nft_expr *expr,
if (par.match->destroy != NULL)
par.match->destroy(&par);

module_put(me);
kfree(expr->ops);
__nft_mt_tg_destroy(me, expr);
}

static void
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -700,6 +716,14 @@ static const struct nfnetlink_subsystem nfnl_compat_subsys = {

static struct nft_expr_type nft_match_type;

static void nft_mt_tg_deactivate(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const struct nft_expr *expr,
enum nft_trans_phase phase)
{
if (phase == NFT_TRANS_COMMIT)
refcount_inc(&nft_compat_pending_destroy);
}

static const struct nft_expr_ops *
nft_match_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
const struct nlattr * const tb[])
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -738,6 +762,7 @@ nft_match_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
ops->type = &nft_match_type;
ops->eval = nft_match_eval;
ops->init = nft_match_init;
ops->deactivate = nft_mt_tg_deactivate,
ops->destroy = nft_match_destroy;
ops->dump = nft_match_dump;
ops->validate = nft_match_validate;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -828,6 +853,7 @@ nft_target_select_ops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
ops->size = NFT_EXPR_SIZE(XT_ALIGN(target->targetsize));
ops->init = nft_target_init;
ops->destroy = nft_target_destroy;
ops->deactivate = nft_mt_tg_deactivate,
ops->dump = nft_target_dump;
ops->validate = nft_target_validate;
ops->data = target;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -891,6 +917,8 @@ static void __exit nft_compat_module_exit(void)
nfnetlink_subsys_unregister(&nfnl_compat_subsys);
nft_unregister_expr(&nft_target_type);
nft_unregister_expr(&nft_match_type);

WARN_ON_ONCE(refcount_read(&nft_compat_pending_destroy) != 1);
}

MODULE_ALIAS_NFNL_SUBSYS(NFNL_SUBSYS_NFT_COMPAT);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit 810bc55

Please sign in to comment.