bpf: put uprobe link's path and task in release callback

commit e9c856c upstream.

There is no need to delay putting either path or task to deallocation
step. It can be done right after bpf_uprobe_unregister. Between release
and dealloc, there could be still some running BPF programs, but they
don't access either task or path, only data in link->uprobes, so it is
safe to do.

On the other hand, doing path_put() in dealloc callback makes this
dealloc sleepable because path_put() itself might sleep. Which is
problematic due to the need to call uprobe's dealloc through call_rcu(),
which is what is done in the next bug fix patch. So solve the problem by
releasing these resources early.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328052426.3042617-1-andrii@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c

@@ -3142,16 +3142,16 @@ static void bpf_uprobe_multi_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
 
 	umulti_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link, link);
 	bpf_uprobe_unregister(&umulti_link->path, umulti_link->uprobes, umulti_link->cnt);
+	if (umulti_link->task)
+		put_task_struct(umulti_link->task);
+	path_put(&umulti_link->path);
 }
 
 static void bpf_uprobe_multi_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
 {
 	struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link *umulti_link;
 
 	umulti_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_uprobe_multi_link, link);
-	if (umulti_link->task)
-		put_task_struct(umulti_link->task);
-	path_put(&umulti_link->path);
 	kvfree(umulti_link->uprobes);
 	kfree(umulti_link);
 }