Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
xfrm: Reject optional tunnel/BEET mode templates in outbound policies
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
[ Upstream commit 3d776e3 ]

xfrm_state_find() uses `encap_family` of the current template with
the passed local and remote addresses to find a matching state.
If an optional tunnel or BEET mode template is skipped in a mixed-family
scenario, there could be a mismatch causing an out-of-bounds read as
the addresses were not replaced to match the family of the next template.

While there are theoretical use cases for optional templates in outbound
policies, the only practical one is to skip IPComp states in inbound
policies if uncompressed packets are received that are handled by an
implicitly created IPIP state instead.

Fixes: 1da177e ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Signed-off-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Acked-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
  • Loading branch information
tobiasbrunner authored and gregkh committed May 24, 2023
1 parent 0d778f0 commit e5a0b28
Showing 1 changed file with 9 additions and 5 deletions.
14 changes: 9 additions & 5 deletions net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c
Expand Up @@ -1743,7 +1743,7 @@ static void copy_templates(struct xfrm_policy *xp, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut,
}

static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
int dir, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
u16 prev_family;
int i;
Expand All @@ -1769,6 +1769,10 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family,
switch (ut[i].mode) {
case XFRM_MODE_TUNNEL:
case XFRM_MODE_BEET:
if (ut[i].optional && dir == XFRM_POLICY_OUT) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "Mode in optional template not allowed in outbound policy");
return -EINVAL;
}
break;
default:
if (ut[i].family != prev_family) {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1806,7 +1810,7 @@ static int validate_tmpl(int nr, struct xfrm_user_tmpl *ut, u16 family,
}

static int copy_from_user_tmpl(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct nlattr **attrs,
struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
int dir, struct netlink_ext_ack *extack)
{
struct nlattr *rt = attrs[XFRMA_TMPL];

Expand All @@ -1817,7 +1821,7 @@ static int copy_from_user_tmpl(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct nlattr **attrs,
int nr = nla_len(rt) / sizeof(*utmpl);
int err;

err = validate_tmpl(nr, utmpl, pol->family, extack);
err = validate_tmpl(nr, utmpl, pol->family, dir, extack);
if (err)
return err;

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1894,7 +1898,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_construct(struct net *net,
if (err)
goto error;

if (!(err = copy_from_user_tmpl(xp, attrs, extack)))
if (!(err = copy_from_user_tmpl(xp, attrs, p->dir, extack)))
err = copy_from_user_sec_ctx(xp, attrs);
if (err)
goto error;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -3443,7 +3447,7 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_compile_policy(struct sock *sk, int opt,
return NULL;

nr = ((len - sizeof(*p)) / sizeof(*ut));
if (validate_tmpl(nr, ut, p->sel.family, NULL))
if (validate_tmpl(nr, ut, p->sel.family, p->dir, NULL))
return NULL;

if (p->dir > XFRM_POLICY_OUT)
Expand Down

0 comments on commit e5a0b28

Please sign in to comment.