mm/huge_memory.c: warn with pr_warn_ratelimited instead of VM_WARN_ON…

…_ONCE_FOLIO

commit 4737edb upstream.

split_huge_page_to_list() WARNs when called for huge zero pages, which
sounds to me too harsh because it does not imply a kernel bug, but just
notifies the event to admins.  On the other hand, this is considered as
critical by syzkaller and makes its testing less efficient, which seems to
me harmful.

So replace the VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO with pr_warn_ratelimited.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230406082004.2185420-1-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev
Fixes: 478d134 ("mm/huge_memory: do not overkill when splitting huge_zero_page")
Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+07a218429c8d19b1fb25@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
  Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000a6f34a05e6efcd01@google.com/
Reviewed-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Xu Yu <xuyu@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

mm/huge_memory.c

@@ -2655,9 +2655,10 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct list_head *list)
 	VM_BUG_ON_FOLIO(!folio_test_large(folio), folio);
 
 	is_hzp = is_huge_zero_page(&folio->page);
-	VM_WARN_ON_ONCE_FOLIO(is_hzp, folio);
-	if (is_hzp)
+	if (is_hzp) {
+		pr_warn_ratelimited("Called split_huge_page for huge zero page\n");
 		return -EBUSY;
+	}
 
 	if (folio_test_writeback(folio))
 		return -EBUSY;