Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
io-wq: fix IO_WORKER_F_FIXED issue in create_io_worker()
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
[ Upstream commit 47cae0c ]

There may be cases like:
        A                                 B
spin_lock(wqe->lock)
nr_workers is 0
nr_workers++
spin_unlock(wqe->lock)
                                     spin_lock(wqe->lock)
                                     nr_wokers is 1
                                     nr_workers++
                                     spin_unlock(wqe->lock)
create_io_worker()
  acct->worker is 1
                                     create_io_worker()
                                       acct->worker is 1

There should be one worker marked IO_WORKER_F_FIXED, but no one is.
Fix this by introduce a new agrument for create_io_worker() to indicate
if it is the first worker.

Fixes: 3d4e4fa ("io-wq: fix no lock protection of acct->nr_worker")
Signed-off-by: Hao Xu <haoxu@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210808135434.68667-3-haoxu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
  • Loading branch information
Hao Xu authored and gregkh committed Aug 18, 2021
1 parent 815a0fe commit f49d457
Showing 1 changed file with 11 additions and 7 deletions.
18 changes: 11 additions & 7 deletions fs/io-wq.c
Expand Up @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ struct io_cb_cancel_data {
bool cancel_all;
};

static void create_io_worker(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wqe *wqe, int index);
static void create_io_worker(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wqe *wqe, int index, bool first);
static void io_wqe_dec_running(struct io_worker *worker);

static bool io_worker_get(struct io_worker *worker)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -249,18 +249,20 @@ static void io_wqe_wake_worker(struct io_wqe *wqe, struct io_wqe_acct *acct)
rcu_read_unlock();

if (!ret) {
bool do_create = false;
bool do_create = false, first = false;

raw_spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
if (acct->nr_workers < acct->max_workers) {
atomic_inc(&acct->nr_running);
atomic_inc(&wqe->wq->worker_refs);
if (!acct->nr_workers)
first = true;
acct->nr_workers++;
do_create = true;
}
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
if (do_create)
create_io_worker(wqe->wq, wqe, acct->index);
create_io_worker(wqe->wq, wqe, acct->index, first);
}
}

Expand All @@ -283,20 +285,22 @@ static void create_worker_cb(struct callback_head *cb)
struct io_wq *wq;
struct io_wqe *wqe;
struct io_wqe_acct *acct;
bool do_create = false;
bool do_create = false, first = false;

cwd = container_of(cb, struct create_worker_data, work);
wqe = cwd->wqe;
wq = wqe->wq;
acct = &wqe->acct[cwd->index];
raw_spin_lock_irq(&wqe->lock);
if (acct->nr_workers < acct->max_workers) {
if (!acct->nr_workers)
first = true;
acct->nr_workers++;
do_create = true;
}
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
if (do_create) {
create_io_worker(wq, cwd->wqe, cwd->index);
create_io_worker(wq, wqe, cwd->index, first);
} else {
atomic_dec(&acct->nr_running);
io_worker_ref_put(wq);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -642,7 +646,7 @@ void io_wq_worker_sleeping(struct task_struct *tsk)
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&worker->wqe->lock);
}

static void create_io_worker(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wqe *wqe, int index)
static void create_io_worker(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wqe *wqe, int index, bool first)
{
struct io_wqe_acct *acct = &wqe->acct[index];
struct io_worker *worker;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -683,7 +687,7 @@ static void create_io_worker(struct io_wq *wq, struct io_wqe *wqe, int index)
worker->flags |= IO_WORKER_F_FREE;
if (index == IO_WQ_ACCT_BOUND)
worker->flags |= IO_WORKER_F_BOUND;
if ((acct->nr_workers == 1) && (worker->flags & IO_WORKER_F_BOUND))
if (first && (worker->flags & IO_WORKER_F_BOUND))
worker->flags |= IO_WORKER_F_FIXED;
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&wqe->lock);
wake_up_new_task(tsk);
Expand Down

0 comments on commit f49d457

Please sign in to comment.