Xanmod 5.12 CacULE-r2 #147
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…ive task. This enahnce responsiveness since the interactive task doesn't compete with another interactive task in same cpu. We pick a cpu that has least interactivity for new/wakeup interactive task. This patch only enhance interactivity when autogroup is disabled. If autogroup is enabled there is no effect of this patch. I also introduced new sysctl sched_interactivity_threshold = 20480. Threshold is set to = sched_interactivity_factor/1.6 You can set threshold to 0 which disable the effects of this patch. Maximum threshold is 2 x sched_interactivity_factor. Note: threshold is used only in select_task_rq_faire to determine if a task is interactive or not. If it is interactive then select a cpu with the least interactive score. If not, then just use the normal cacule/cfs way.
…me of tasks normalize every 800ms)
…of tasks normalize every 11s)
…e Benchmar (pythone responsive script) shows bad results because autogroup assignments tries to group up interactive task with others. However, running interactive task in separate terminal shows good results.
xanmod
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2024
…find_and_get_node_by_id() [ Upstream commit 4207b55 ] The BPF helper bpf_cgroup_from_id() calls kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() which acquires kernfs_idr_lock, which is an non-raw non-IRQ-safe lock. This can lead to deadlocks as bpf_cgroup_from_id() can be called from any BPF programs including e.g. the ones that attach to functions which are holding the scheduler rq lock. Consider the following BPF program: SEC("fentry/__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked") int BPF_PROG(__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked, struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *affn_ctx, struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(p->cgroups->dfl_cgrp->kn->id); if (cgrp) { bpf_printk("%d[%s] in %s", p->pid, p->comm, cgrp->kn->name); bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp); } return 0; } __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked() is called with rq lock held and the above BPF program calls bpf_cgroup_from_id() within leading to the following lockdep warning: ===================================================== WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.7.0-rc3-work-00053-g07124366a1d7-dirty #147 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- repro/1620 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ffffffff833b3688 (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70 and this task is already holding: ffff888237ced698 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: task_rq_lock+0x4e/0xf0 which would create a new lock dependency: (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} ... Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(kernfs_idr_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&rq->__lock); lock(kernfs_idr_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->__lock); *** DEADLOCK *** ... Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x781/0x2a40 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70 cgroup_get_from_id+0x21/0x240 bpf_cgroup_from_id+0xe/0x20 bpf_prog_98652316e9337a5a___set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x96/0x11a bpf_trampoline_6442545632+0x4f/0x1000 __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x5/0x5a0 sched_setaffinity+0x1b3/0x290 __x64_sys_sched_setaffinity+0x4f/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e Let's fix it by protecting kernfs_node and kernfs_root with RCU and making kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() acquire rcu_read_lock() instead of kernfs_idr_lock. This adds an rcu_head to kernfs_node making it larger by 16 bytes on 64bit. Combined with the preceding rearrange patch, the net increase is 8 bytes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240109214828.252092-4-tj@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
xanmod
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 13, 2024
…find_and_get_node_by_id() [ Upstream commit 4207b55 ] The BPF helper bpf_cgroup_from_id() calls kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() which acquires kernfs_idr_lock, which is an non-raw non-IRQ-safe lock. This can lead to deadlocks as bpf_cgroup_from_id() can be called from any BPF programs including e.g. the ones that attach to functions which are holding the scheduler rq lock. Consider the following BPF program: SEC("fentry/__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked") int BPF_PROG(__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked, struct task_struct *p, struct affinity_context *affn_ctx, struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf) { struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(p->cgroups->dfl_cgrp->kn->id); if (cgrp) { bpf_printk("%d[%s] in %s", p->pid, p->comm, cgrp->kn->name); bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp); } return 0; } __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked() is called with rq lock held and the above BPF program calls bpf_cgroup_from_id() within leading to the following lockdep warning: ===================================================== WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected 6.7.0-rc3-work-00053-g07124366a1d7-dirty #147 Not tainted ----------------------------------------------------- repro/1620 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ffffffff833b3688 (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70 and this task is already holding: ffff888237ced698 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: task_rq_lock+0x4e/0xf0 which would create a new lock dependency: (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2} ... Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(kernfs_idr_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&rq->__lock); lock(kernfs_idr_lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->__lock); *** DEADLOCK *** ... Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70 dump_stack+0x10/0x20 __lock_acquire+0x781/0x2a40 lock_acquire+0xbf/0x1f0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40 kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70 cgroup_get_from_id+0x21/0x240 bpf_cgroup_from_id+0xe/0x20 bpf_prog_98652316e9337a5a___set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x96/0x11a bpf_trampoline_6442545632+0x4f/0x1000 __set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x5/0x5a0 sched_setaffinity+0x1b3/0x290 __x64_sys_sched_setaffinity+0x4f/0x60 do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e Let's fix it by protecting kernfs_node and kernfs_root with RCU and making kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() acquire rcu_read_lock() instead of kernfs_idr_lock. This adds an rcu_head to kernfs_node making it larger by 16 bytes on 64bit. Combined with the preceding rearrange patch, the net increase is 8 bytes. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com> Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240109214828.252092-4-tj@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.