Fixed a few minor grammar issues in 20.3 release blog #733
Conversation
👷 Deploy request for kodi-tv pending review.Visit the deploys page to approve it
|
|
Many thanks for this - clearly, my proof-reading was up (down...) to my usual standards, so I'm happy for the corrections. I could try to argue that some of them were merely stylistic choices, but I'm not sure I'd be on very solid ground... I've cherry-picked the changes and added them via our CMS, as I suspect merging directly might be problematic. Feel free to let me know if you spot anything else significant, although going back in time over old posts is probably an exercise in futility. |
|
Thanks. Yes, I agree some of my suggestions were nitpicks and not really important! What usually happens is that if I notice a definite typo, like the extraneous "they" or the lowercase "if", I go to edit the document, and then I tend to make other suggestions just "while I'm there". I.e. things that I wouldn't have bothered to point out on their own. I forgot you have the CMS, though. I recall a previous discussion where I had wanted to correct typos on older blogs, but we concluded it wasn't really possible without CMS access :( Thanks for reimplementing the fixes (and adding more) manually anyway :) |
|
FYI, adding stuff here via PRs should be fine and not give any problems whatsoever. The CMS is just a different way to do exactly this. |
Do changes made via PR get "backported" (probably not the right word, but hopefully you'll get what I mean) to the CMS? |
|
Yes, the CMS will always just load the data from here and show it. |
|
Ah that's great, thanks. |
|
Related: #304 |
No description provided.