New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[clang-format] change format for constructor init and switch/case indent #16701
Merged
phunkyfish
merged 4 commits into
xbmc:master
from
phunkyfish:clang-format-constructor-init-list
Oct 9, 2019
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d1628d4
[docs] Fix indexes for code guidelines
phunkyfish d0dd36c
[clang-format] change constructor init list to colon on newline, brea…
phunkyfish cf7b0bb
[clang-format] switch - indent case and default
phunkyfish 1eeec97
[docs] Update code guidelines on C++14 usage
phunkyfish File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The reason I like the following style (
BreakConstructorInitializers: BeforeComma
) is that in most cases it doesn't touch the previous line to add a comma if another initializer is added. If the majority prefers to keep the comma on the previous line that's okay for me.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is "doesn't touch the previous line to add a comma if another initializer is added" really worth this very special formatting style? My personal opinion: It's not.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How is it "very special"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only my personal feeling, which got inspired from other C++ projects I know.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think Rechi has a good point about keeping line history clean. However, I'm also with ksooo on this specific case, where I feel the leading comma is ugly enough to warrant an exception to the clean line mantra.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I strongly prefer the leading comma because it provides much cleaner diffs.