Mi pad (Android 4.4.4)
On this device, Kripton wins 5/7. I excluded batch access because this test simply iterate over list.
| mipad (android 4.4.4) | BATCH CREATE | BATCH UPDATE | BATCH READ | BATCH ACCESS | BATCH DELETE | QUERY INDEXED | ONE BY ONE CREATE | ONE BY ONE UPDATE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| greenDAO | 603 | 817 | 318 | 4.5 | 72 | 4458 | 4809 | |
| dbflow | 588 | 6581 | 533 | 3 | 52 | 5050 | 4506 | 5212 |
| kripton | 716 | 784 | 447 | 6.5 | 7.5 | 226 | 1415 | 1094 |
| room | 639 | 846 | 352 | 6 | 124.5 | 346 | 4661.5 | 4887 |
| requery | 1470 | 6209 | 819 | 142 | 73 | 592 | 5796 | 5383 |
| sqlite | 1860 | 2635 | 348 | 6 | 62 | 289 | 4612 | 4563 |
| ormlite | 1233 | 1699 | 718 | 13 | 69 | 528 | 5635 | 4503 |
At last, for each result i take best result and i compare Kripton result with it. In the following table it is summarize the results. Note that the difference is in percentage (50% state for: the library in this row is 50% slower than best performance in this benchmark). The best result is 0%, it states that this is the best performance in those kind of test.
| BATCH CREATE | BATCH UPDATE | BATCH READ | BATCH ACCESS | BATCH DELETE | QUERY INDEXED | ONE BY ONE CREATE | ONE BY ONE UPDATE | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| greenDAO | 3% | 4% | 0% | 50% | 860% | 215% | 340% | |
| dbflow | 0% | 739% | 68% | 0% | 593% | 2135% | 218% | 376% |
| kripton | 22% | 0% | 41% | 117% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
| room | 9% | 8% | 1% | 100% | 1560% | 53% | 229% | 347% |
| requery | 130% | 692% | 135% | 2267% | 873% | 162% | 310% | 392% |
| sqlite | 191% | 211% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
| ormlite | 0% | 0% | 106% | 117% | 11% | 83% | 22% | 0% |
