Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Gcp runtime #371

Merged
merged 12 commits into from Sep 1, 2023
Merged

Gcp runtime #371

merged 12 commits into from Sep 1, 2023

Conversation

Intex32
Copy link
Member

@Intex32 Intex32 commented Aug 31, 2023

rework of GCP and Conversation for the 0.0.3 release

@Intex32 Intex32 marked this pull request as ready for review August 31, 2023 11:57
@Intex32 Intex32 requested a review from Montagon August 31, 2023 11:57
javipacheco
javipacheco previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@javipacheco javipacheco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀 LGTM!

Just minor comments. Really good job! I have tested the code locally and everything works as expected

Montagon
Montagon previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@Montagon Montagon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀

@Intex32 Intex32 dismissed stale reviews from Montagon and javipacheco via 9f3b14d August 31, 2023 13:22
Montagon
Montagon previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2023
raulraja
raulraja previously approved these changes Aug 31, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@raulraja raulraja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great!, thank you, @Intex32 . I think before merging these, we should address the concern around the default parameters in the GCP extensions.

@Intex32 Intex32 dismissed stale reviews from raulraja and Montagon via 7db363e August 31, 2023 13:49
@Intex32
Copy link
Member Author

Intex32 commented Aug 31, 2023

Looks great!, thank you, @Intex32 . I think before merging these, we should address the concern around the default parameters in the GCP extensions.

We cannot provide defaults as we need access to the GCP instance (which is not accessible through the conversion). In contrast to OpenAI we have additional parameters "location" and "projectId".

raulraja
raulraja previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@raulraja raulraja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything looks great, thanks @Intex32 !,
can we rename the functions to not include the Gcp suffix in https://github.com/xebia-functional/xef/pull/371/files#r1312844834 ?

Copy link
Contributor

@javipacheco javipacheco left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚀 LGTM!

@Intex32 Intex32 merged commit 61a48cb into main Sep 1, 2023
5 checks passed
@Intex32 Intex32 deleted the gcp-runtime branch September 1, 2023 11:43
@Intex32 Intex32 mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants