Add the runner param. #28
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
One of the recent request was to move the runner out, so you could write: `create(..., runner=Sync(), tasks=[list of tasks])` Still unsure if we should move forward with this implementation. The runner object will always have a strong dependency on the tasks it runs. Another alternative would be to have a `run` method instead that takes a runner and a list of tasks.
Merged
|
I like #29 better. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
One of the recent request was to move the runner out, so you could write:
create(..., runner=Sync(), tasks=[list of tasks])Still unsure if we should move forward with this implementation. The runner object will
always have a strong dependency on the tasks it runs. Another alternative would be to
have a
runmethod instead that takes a runner and a list of tasks.