You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
@xinshuoweng Hi, thanks for your sharing. I have a question about the orientation correction technique which add a π to the orientation that mentioned in your paper, but your code is self.kf.x[3] = -1 * self.kf.x[3] instead of self.kf.x[3] += np.pi, could you please explain why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think you miss some considerations in the orientation correction technique, and I improve it and get the following result:
=================evaluation with confidence threshold 3.398000==================
MOTA MOTP MODA MODP MT ML IDS FRAG F1 Prec Recall FAR TP FP FN
0.7657 0.7916 0.7657 0.8375 0.7004 0.0727 0 50 0.8979 0.9327 0.8656 0.2229 24793 1790 3850
=====================evaluation: average at all thresholds======================
AMOTA AMOTP APrec
0.3948 0.7467 0.8444
All the items are little better than the results in your paper. I argue that your orientation correction technique is not suitable to all scenes, and the limit of kitti dataset cover up the mistakes.
@xinshuoweng Hi, thanks for your sharing. I have a question about the orientation correction technique which add a π to the orientation that mentioned in your paper, but your code is self.kf.x[3] = -1 * self.kf.x[3] instead of self.kf.x[3] += np.pi, could you please explain why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: