App gets stuck after correct answer in Reviews #51
Comments
I'm aware. It's been happening to me as well and it's annoying as hell. Pretty sure it was introduced with #49. Haven't had the time to look into it yet though. |
@Aralox If you have an idea or could tackle this anytime soon, that'd be great. |
I'll have a look tomorrow after work (2245 at the moment) |
Submitted a PR (#52). It's a pretty simple bug which I should have found before submitting my last pull request - my bad. I had to create a new WaniKani account to test reviewing radicals, as I have too many vocab reviews on my main account. I've not tested the exact scenario you described @squasheds, as I don't have any reading reviews available yet. I'm fairly confident it only happens for radicals, but please try out the fix and let me know anyway. I'll verify it once I unlock some kanji on my new account :). @xiprox, how would you like pull requests to be done? I just made my change on the master branch and committed, but do you prefer if I made a new branch for any changes? Also, could you please mention in the readme that to compile the project, we have to create a |
I'll be taking a look at the #52 shortly. And yes, on-topic names for branches would probably be nice. |
Has the fix been implemented in the available beta at playstore? I downloaded it three days ago and there has been no new update. I just had the bug happen twice again today when going from a reading question to a radical one. Yesterday it also happened when going from a meaning question though I dont remember to which kind of question it crossed. |
@squasheds The change is now up on the alpha track on the Play Store. I haven't been able to test it myself, so can't say if it works for sure. |
App updated 3 hours ago, problem persist on my phone. Any debug log or other info I can contribute? |
I just did around 40 reviews in different batches and had no occurrences of this issue. In contrast, reverting #52 brings back the error even with only a few reviews. @madmalkav Are you sure you are on the latest alpha, again? I just promoted alpha to beta though, so you should get it there in a bit anyway. EDIT: It's now live in the beta. |
Ouch, you are completely right, I'm on Beta channel.
El 8 sept. 2017 4:26 a. m., "İhsan Işık" <notifications@github.com>
escribió:
… I just did around 40 reviews in different batches and had no occurrences
of this issue. In contrast, reverting #52
<#52> brings back the
error even with only a few reviews.
@madmalkav <https://github.com/madmalkav> Are you sure you are on the
latest *alpha*, again? Though, I'll promote alpha to beta so you should
get it there in a bit anyway.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#51 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKgp-UDLPN6ki3o70SVyrisd2DCeR0a4ks5sgKXjgaJpZM4PN1F1>
.
|
Ok. I take it that it's solved for you as well now? Guess this issue can be closed. |
Haven't the chance to test yet, as soon as I can I'll reupdate the app and
retry.
El 8 sept. 2017 8:12 a. m., "İhsan Işık" <notifications@github.com>
escribió:
… Ok. I take it that it's solved for you as well now? Guess this issue can
be closed.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#51 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKgp-UCJD8LOtl3j-GcT31URB1JivZIYks5sgNq-gaJpZM4PN1F1>
.
|
Running the latest Alpha version.
Sometimes, after correctly answering a Reading question and clicking to go on, its answer seems to be dragged into the next question, which becomes un-answerable and un-skipable. Once this happens, it is imposible to go forward (sacrificing the current question) because the > arrow won't do anything, only going back by pressing Home or <- arrow is posible. It has happened about five times since installing the Alpha a couple of days back.
In this case, previous question was "ganmen" and, I believe, this reading was "tombstone" (or whatever it might have been XD). As can be seen, to to and ne were added to the previous "ganmen" as I tried to answer this new question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: