[Security] now published as @xmldom/xmldom

[karfau]

&TLDR;

We published 0.7.0 to npm as @xmldom/xmldom and will continue to publish updates there.
To get the security update, you have to switch the package you use in your package.json.

"quick post-mortem" by @brodybits

Types from DefinitelyTyped are now included as of @xmldom/xmldom version 0.7.1.

Here are some stats regarding packages transitioning from one package to the other:

• @xmldom/xmldom @ npm
  • 
  • 
  • socket.dev
• xmldom @ npm
  • (more then 2.5 million are for deprecated versions!)
  • 
  • socket.dev

Historical daily/weekly downloads

We are currently not aware of a badge that gives accurate numbers for dependents, data is form the 2025-02-13.
according to npm:

• @xmldom/xmldom: 766
• xmldom: 2412
  according to Github:
• 

Original Summary

To update the library to the newest version including the latest security fix you will have to install to from the github repo or download the artifact from the github release and install it locally.

For details of how to do that and asking questions please use the related discussion

We have filed a ticket at the npm support team addressing the issue.

We will Post updates about the current status here but lock this issue to only allow additions by maintainers, to allow people to subscribe and get informed when something changes.

---

Quick background from @brodybits

• Original xmldom was published from: https://github.com/jindw/xmldom
• xmldom was hard-forked into the current location and continued to be published as xmldom until 0.6.0, as described in CHANGELOG.md
• Current authors were removed from the xmldom package on npm
• now published as @xmldom/xmldom
• posted quick post-mortem below

[karfau]

GitHub (GitHub Support)
Aug 5, 2021, 1:39 PM UTC

Christian,

We are investigating your issue.

Thank you for your patience,
npm engineering

---

GitHub (GitHub Support)
Aug 5, 2021, 6:25 PM UTC
Hi Christian,

Thanks for reaching out.

We are currently unable to find any documentation or transactions, to confirm the unscoped xmldom package was previously owned by @xmldom org.

Please forward any supporting document or communication for the package ownership. Once received, we'll review your request to transfer the package to xmldom org.

Best.

Judith
GitHub Support

---

I replied today (6th of August)

Hello Judith,

I just checked npm info for the different xmldom versions:
The members of the npm xmldom org released all versions since 0.1.29.

The last release that was published by the maintainers listed on the npm website (jinjinyun and jindw) was 0.1.27 in November 2016

We documented the transition in our changelog, which is shipped with the packages since 0.3.0 (the linked section since 0.4.0).

Just in case this isn't enough, I Cced Chris Brody so he can reply with some reference of the mail conversation that lead to npm providing access to the package back then, in case it's still available.

Best,
Christian

[karfau]

Just to clarify that there was a misunderstanding from my side, I'm adding here the reply that @brodybits added a day after my response:

Hello I would like to add some context with a correction, adding one of the former publishers in CC.

Back in December 2019 I sent a request to all xmldom package owners at the time with CC to npm support to find a way to get xmldom updated on npm.

In response to my request, Eric Newport AKA kethinov added me to the xmldom package on npm.

I created the xmldom org on GitHub and started publishing updates from this project: https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom

I have also registered xmldom as an org on npm: https://www.npmjs.com/org/xmldom
And I have obtained both xmldom.com and xmldom.org.

Our plan was to keep the xmldom package updated from https://github.com/xmldom/xmldom and consider splitting xmldom into smaller parts in the @xmldom namespace as discussed in this issue: #54

As a next step, I will send a copy of the conversation I had with Eric Newport and npm support to start updating the package back in December 2019.

Chris

---

From @brodybits - I am quoting below what I sent to npm support to quote the original conversation in I had with Eric Newport to start publishing updates to the xmldom package. I am quoting in plain-text format with someone's last name and all email addresses redacted out for privacy. I am quoting here to keep everything in chronological order, to help with a post-mortem analysis of what happened and why.

From: Chris Brody <xxx@xxx.xxx>
Date: Fri, Aug 6, 2021 at 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: [npm Support] - Access to (publish) xmldom package was
removed from xmldom org
To: karfau <xxx@xxx.xxx>, npm Support <xxx@xxx.xxx>
Cc: Kethinov <xxx@xxx.xxx>


Here is the original conversation where Eric Newport aka @kethinov
added me to the xmldom package.

Please note this clause in the email from Eric Newport:

with all previous contributors and owners welcome to resume
maintenance if they wish to become active again.


Our intention was to work together with the previous owners if they
wanted, NOT for xmldom to become fragmented between GitHub and npm as
it is now.

From: Kethinov <xxx@xxx.xxx>
Date: Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 3:54 PM
Subject: Re: [npm] Re: Updating xmldom package
To: Chris Brody <xxx@xxx.xxx>
Cc: npm <xxx@xxx.xxx>, <xxx@xxx.xxx>,
<xxx@xxx.xxx>, <xxx@xxx.xxx>


FYI to all, I joined the GitHub organization and added Chris to the
npm package. Given Chris’ interest in maintaining the package. I think
it makes sense to hard fork xmldom and do maintenance from the new
GitHub organization instead, with all previous contributors and owners
welcome to resume maintenance if they wish to become active again.


On Dec 17, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Chris Brody <xxx@xxx.xxx> wrote:

Thanks to npm support for the response. The response did not seem to
include visible copy to any of the existing package owners. I am now
writing back with hopefully all existing owners included.

My npm user name: brodybits (I did already put this user name in the
original email, evidently not clear enough)

I am now waiting for a solution, hopefully from an existing owner, or
from npm support as a last resort. As I said before, I would be happy
with either of the following outcomes:

- existing owner publish an update and keep it in sync on GitHub
- someone grant me publishing rights on npm

I would also like to thank @kethinov for responding. I have now
registered xmldom org on GitHub and invited @kethinov to join as an
owner.

Chris

https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisbrody/

On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 4:12 PM Judith XXX (npm) <xxx@xxx.xxx> wrote:
>
> ##- Please type your reply above this line -##
>
> Your request (75068) has been updated. To add additional comments, reply to this email.
>
> Judith XXX (npm)
>
> Dec 17, 13:12 PST
>
> Hi Chris and @jindw
>
> @ Chris: Thanks for starting this conversation and CC'ing npm support. I'll keep an eye on this discussion and if there isn't any progress in a few weeks, I'll respond directly. Also, provide the npm username that will be used to transfer the package over to you.
>
> @ jindw: We would really appreciate if you would be willing to work with Chris on this issue. If you agree with this request, then you can run npm owner add <chris username> xmldom or you can let me know and I'll be happy to do the work on my end.
>
> If either of you has questions about this process, please let me know, I'll be here to help!
>
> Best.
>
> Judith
> Support Tech
> npm, Inc.
>
>
>
> Chris Brody
>
> Dec 16, 09:33 PST
>
> Or make the hard fork in a new xmldom org, which seems to be not (yet) taken on GitHub.
>
> What should we do?
>
>
> Kethinov
>
> Dec 15, 19:41 PST
>
> I don’t have push powers to the GitHub repo, only the npm package. We would need jindw to grant more people admin over the GitHub repo (or to simply hard fork the repo) in order to get an update to the npm package cleanly.
>
> > On Dec 15, 2019, at 6:22 PM, Chris Brody <xxx@xxx.xxx> wrote:
> >
> > We would like to get the xmldom package updated on npm, specifically
> > with license field fixed ref:
> >
> > * https://github.com/jindw/xmldom/issues/248
> > * https://github.com/jindw/xmldom/issues/239
> > * https://github.com/jindw/xmldom/pull/178
> > * https://github.com/apache/cordova-common/issues/122
> >
> > I am making this request according to: https://www.npmjs.com/policies/disputes
> >
> > I would be happy with one of the following outcomes:
> >
> > - existing owner publish an update
> > - give brodybits (myself) or any other Cordova committer publishing
> > rights, using the following command for example: npm owner add
> > brodybits
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. I would like
> > to thank you guys on behalf of the entire user community for your
> > efforts to author, publish, and maintain this package.
> >
> > Thanks and best regards,
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > https://www.linkedin.com/in/chrisbrody/

[karfau]

We just received an answer:

GitHub (GitHub Support)
Aug 9, 2021, 10:17 AM UTC

Hey,

sorry this is taking so long. I'll try to get you at least publish access for 'karfau' and 'brodybits' to be able to post an update today (hopefully next few hours) and will also push to get the package transferred to your org (including the xmldom-alpha so you can deprecate it).

Stefan

Update: I'm now running a script that checks npm owner ls xmldom on a regular basis and will "make some noise" when I'm listed again.
Last checked 2021-08-09T19:30:00 (will check again tomorrow)