not an issue: CSS optimization

[gn0st1c]

@xoseperez :
i thought you might want to see/test this.

i renamed pure css class names and saved about 4k.
just replaced "pure-" with "p-"

before: 65539 index.html.gz
after: 61060 index.html.gz

www.tar.gz

[xoseperez]

Amazing. Same concern as with #870 but it really pays off!

[gn0st1c]

@xoseperez : that was also my concern but it's worth the trouble.

when you update the pure css files, just run; grep -rl 'pure-' . | xargs sed -i '' 's/pure-/p-/g'

[xoseperez]

@gn0st1c I have added a replace in the gulp file that should take care of replacing "pure-" with "p-" over the single merged file just before the gzipping.
But my numbers are not as spectacular. I just get about 1Kb reduction on the final gzipped file... where is the difference? I have pushed the code anyway.

[gn0st1c]

@xoseperez : do not push the code.. because gulp will also replace file references but won't rename the files;

        <link rel="stylesheet" href="vendor/pure-1.0.0.min.css" />
        <link rel="stylesheet" href="vendor/pure-grids-responsive-1.0.0.min.css" />

[gn0st1c]

your and my file size differences are because, i have more optimization locally. removing unnecessary html end tags, etc etc. i'll PR when i'm done :)

[xoseperez]

@gn0st1c I have pushed my code which does the replacing over the merged file, so the files in the html folder are not changed.