Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The XRootD throttle system does not function normally in the pss(proxy) environment #1832

Closed
geonmo opened this issue Nov 24, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@geonmo
Copy link

geonmo commented Nov 24, 2022

Hello, XRootD Developers,

I am operating a CMS Tier-2 center. I am contacting you because there is an issue related to throttle syntax.

Since our site subscribes to the global federation redirection of CMS experiments, we are supposed to respond to data requests from other CMS sites. This is called CMS AAA.

The problem is that when a particular user creates an enormous amount of grid jobs requesting data that is only on our site.

We used dCache as a backend and ran an xrootd daemon in the front for the federation subscription.

We set "throttle.throttle concurrency 30" in this xroot daemon setting, but we found that all of these transfer requests were delivered to dCache.

In some cases, the number rises momentarily and is blocked, but xrootd delivered the request to dCache, rather than the data transfer itself. So, it shows the concurrent jobs decrease after requesting delivery. Therefore, not only will there be tens of thousands of job requests waiting on the dCache side, but xrootd itself has tens of thousands of TCP sessions, which is a huge burden on the server.

I think the xrootd server is responsible for the actual transmission burden because I set the pss instead of redirecting. But I think it's a fatal bug to leave out of the throttle number.

Please review it.

Also, I would like to ask if it is possible to develop a queue system to pass site stability checks such as the SAM test in the throttle setting.

Regards,

@geonmo
Copy link
Author

geonmo commented Nov 24, 2022

dcache_ddos4

I think this kind of request is almost a DDOS attack.

@abh3
Copy link
Member

abh3 commented Nov 26, 2022 via email

@abh3 abh3 self-assigned this Dec 1, 2022
@abh3 abh3 added the Discussion label Dec 1, 2022
@geonmo geonmo closed this as completed Apr 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants