Fix redirection handling #1024
Merged
Fix redirection handling #1024
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The opaque info gets appended later on in the function a second time.
Without this, the opaque information kept in the resource string is not a valid resource URL. This differs from how the header2cgi worked, which copies over opaque information quoted.
Without this, the hdr2cgi data is dropped on a redirect.
Closed
|
@jthiltges - could you patch this one into the redirector at Nebraska? |
|
Michal, wait a bit please, the testbeds are crunching |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There were a few issues with redirection handling:
?characterresourceplusopaquemember did not quote arguments in all cases.