Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicit Message Encryption ProtoXEP: Add a 0.0.2 version #241

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 26, 2016

Conversation

linkmauve
Copy link
Member

  • Made the 'name' attribute optional for existing mechanisms.
  • Added a remark about the possibility to hide encrypted messages
    following user input.
  • Made explicit that this protocol affects any encryption mechanism,
    present or future, not only those listed here.
  • Display the namespace of the encryption mechanism in the default
    messages.

installing an appropriate plugin, your message will be displayed
shortly.</p>
<p>🔒 This message was encrypted with OpenPGP for XMPP
(urn:xmpp:openpgp:0), downloading and installing an appropriate plugin,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think the wording can be improved. How about something like

This message was encrypted with OpenPGP for XMPP (urn:xmpp:openpgp:0). Download the OpenPGP plugin to enable this encryption method.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I actually just dropped this message, the first one was enough.

- Made the 'name' attribute optional for existing mechanisms.
- Added a remark about the possibility to hide encrypted messages
  following user input.
- Made explicit that this protocol affects any encryption mechanism,
  present or future, not only those listed here.
- Display the namespace of the encryption mechanism in the default
  messages.
- Remove the second example message, which didn’t add any useful
  information.
@Flowdalic Flowdalic added the Ready To Merge No acknowledgements of other parties are needed anymore. There may be changes to do at merge time. label Oct 13, 2016
@Flowdalic Flowdalic merged commit 557c240 into xsf:master Oct 26, 2016
@linkmauve linkmauve deleted the eme branch October 27, 2016 18:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Ready To Merge No acknowledgements of other parties are needed anymore. There may be changes to do at merge time.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants