Add "conditionally accepted"

[b-studios]

I appreciate having our paper listed, but it is not yet fully accepted at OOPSLA and I do not want to spread the impression it is.
For the time being, maybe we can add "conditionally accepted"?

[yallop]

Thanks, @b-studios!

@dhil: we could avoid this issue in the future by waiting until a paper is unconditionally accepted before adding it to the bibliography. What do you think?

[b-studios]

Another option would be to just mark it as TR. Actually, the title of the OOPSLA submission is also slightly different (due to requirements of double blind reviews)

[dhil]

@dhil: we could avoid this issue in the future by waiting until a paper is unconditionally accepted before adding it to the bibliography. What do you think?

Yes!! That's what I have done in the past! This is my mistake, apologies! When it was presented to me I understood it to be (fully) accepted, and I didn't bother to check :-) Lesson learnt.

[b-studios]

Agreed, technical report sounds good to me. I am very happy that it is already listed since I want people to read it :)

[dhil]

Great! Thanks for correcting my error! I will merge as soon as the CI completes successfully.

[b-studios]

Great, thanks for adding it in the first place and sorry, if I communicated it wrong somewhere

[dhil]

No worries. It was communicated to me by an intermediary. Supposedly, this communication wasn't lossless, or maybe I had instantiated my context with some wrong assumptions ;-))

[dhil]

It seems like bentnib.org is down at the moment. I will open an issue to notify Bob.

[b-studios]

@dhil now that our paper is published (https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3428194) should we replace the TR with the officially published version? The TR contains additional material, maybe it can be linked in addition to the official paper?

[dhil]

Yes!