Given the task definition, example input & output, solve the new input case.
In this task, you will use your knowledge about language (and common sense) to determine what element the marked number refers to. The numbers are marked with two underlines around them, like: _ number _. There are several possible answers, you'll need to choose the proper one. Carefully read the given text, pay special attention to the marked number, think about what (unwritten) information the marked number holds inside, choose the most adequate word(s) from the optional answers. If none of them seems right to you, there's also an option for other. If your answer is "REFERENCE", also write the reference entity, otherwise write the implicit option name. Options to choose from are:
REFERENCE: Some object which is being mentioned in the text before or after the target number. The reference answer has a higher priority than any other. If both Reference and another answer are possible, prioritize the Reference.
YEAR: Describing a calendric year
AGE: Describing someone's age
CURRENCY: Reference to some monetary value e.g dollar, euro etc.
PEOPLE: Describing a single/plural persons
TIME: Describing a time of the day. Usually you can add the word o'clock after those numbers.
OTHER: Some other option, which isn't listed here.
Example: Jess Mastriani: No, I don't want another crooler, thank you very much.
 FBI Agent Nicole Scott: But it's good for you. It's got... honeyglaze. Please die for this crooler, Jess.
 Jess Mastriani: I've had _ two _ already. Who eats three croolers in a night? 
FBI Agent Nicole Scott: Take a look. [Nicole takes a huge bite] Mmmmm, Mmmmm, Mmmmm!
Output: REFERENCE crooler
In this example, the number two refers to something that appears in this text. In this example, it refers to the word: crooler.

New input case for you: Morley Safer - Correspondent:  The conspirators had managed , in the decade from _ 1936 _ to 1946 , to dismantle streetcar lines in forty - five cities . The key to the federal case was intent . Did the defendants just go along with the national trend , or did they destroy electric mass - transit on purpose ? The juries and the judges said that they were big boys and they knew what they were doing . But Dixon thinks the punishment was ridiculous . The government had asked that individual corporate officers be sent to jail .
William Dixon: The government did not get them , much to my disquietous surprise and personal disgust .
Morley Safer - Correspondent: What was the punishment for the individuals ?
William Dixon: Well , the judge said this was nothing more than a " traffic violation " by the defendants , and he imposed a one - dollar fine on the individual defendants as punishment .
Morley Safer - Correspondent: The corporations , on the other hand , were given the maximum penalty : a $ 5000 fine .
Output:
YEAR