You will be given a definition of a task first, then an example. Follow the example to solve a new instance of the task.
In this task, you will use your knowledge about language (and common sense) to determine what element the marked number refers to. The numbers are marked with two underlines around them, like: _ number _. There are several possible answers, you'll need to choose the proper one. Carefully read the given text, pay special attention to the marked number, think about what (unwritten) information the marked number holds inside, choose the most adequate word(s) from the optional answers. If none of them seems right to you, there's also an option for other. If your answer is "REFERENCE", also write the reference entity, otherwise write the implicit option name. Options to choose from are:
REFERENCE: Some object which is being mentioned in the text before or after the target number. The reference answer has a higher priority than any other. If both Reference and another answer are possible, prioritize the Reference.
YEAR: Describing a calendric year
AGE: Describing someone's age
CURRENCY: Reference to some monetary value e.g dollar, euro etc.
PEOPLE: Describing a single/plural persons
TIME: Describing a time of the day. Usually you can add the word o'clock after those numbers.
OTHER: Some other option, which isn't listed here.

Jess Mastriani: No, I don't want another crooler, thank you very much.
 FBI Agent Nicole Scott: But it's good for you. It's got... honeyglaze. Please die for this crooler, Jess.
 Jess Mastriani: I've had _ two _ already. Who eats three croolers in a night? 
FBI Agent Nicole Scott: Take a look. [Nicole takes a huge bite] Mmmmm, Mmmmm, Mmmmm!
Solution: REFERENCE crooler
Why? In this example, the number two refers to something that appears in this text. In this example, it refers to the word: crooler.

New input: Linkara:  I think by now , you should know how I feel about Youngblood . In case you do n't , it sucks ! You can yell until you 're blue in the face about how the concept of a proactive superhero team that has merchandising and appears on talk shows and are celebrities and crap is such a wonderful idea , and it 's just the execution that fails , but in the end , it does n't change that Youngblood sucks ! You can tell me about the runs from Alan Moore or the revived series from _ 2011 _ , and that 's great if they really are good , but it just keeps bringing me back to the question of why the hell anyone would want to do anything with this series when there is so much frigid ' baggage with it ! Look , my rant against the X - Men in my Next 15 Screw - Ups was half joking . I do n't hate the X - Men and there are plenty of bad stories out there that have nothing to do with them , and there are great runs on the X - Men books . But Youngblood is a team that does not deserve all the hard work of creators ! It 's a bunch of unmemorable ripoff characters , growling and gritting teeth , and saying really stupid things , and squinting and doing exaggerated poses and all that crap ! Let Youngblood die , already ! Just let it die ! Rob Liefeld does not deserve the amount of loyalty that he somehow has engendered ! What 's that ? Rob Liefeld is really enthusiastic about the industry and is really an awesome guy if you know him in person , and loves comics and everything about the medium ? Yeah , well , I 'm really enthusiastic about the medium , but no one says that I should be drawing comic books ! Rob Liefeld ca n't write ! Rob Liefeld ca n't draw ! Rob Liefeld ca n't create ! And do n't go telling me about how he created Deadpool and Cable ! One - he did n't create Deadpool ! He created some boring - ass mercenary who spoke in yellow - colored speech bubbles ! Nobody would give a damn about him if not for the work of everybody else but him ! And as for Cable , most of my knowledge of the character comes from the animated series , but even if Cable really is all that awesome and iconic a character , well , congratulations . You have found one , all of one character that Rob Liefeld created that 's actually good , except a good creator is capable of making more than just one good character ! Liefeld , on the other hand , settles on inventing 60000 characters , and none of them are good ! But to cite that Deadpool example again , is he really the one who created him if everything about the character that people like that was done by others ? You show me a Rob Liefeld character that people like , and I 'll show you the other creators who are responsible for you liking him . The point is , companies , stop giving him work ! Consumers , stop buying things with his name on it ! And my fans , stop telling me about movies that are supposedly being made with his characters ! Ooh , a Godyssey movie ! I 'm sure I 'll see that NEVER , because not a single movie that Rob Liefeld 's characters have been developed for has actually ever been made ! And do n't bring up " Not Deadpool " in the Wolverine movie ! I should not have to explain that again - Deadpool 's not really his character , that was n't really Deadpool , and he was n't the main character of the damn movie !
Solution:
YEAR