docs: normalize code block formatting #1646
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Some Markdown code blocks were defined with three backticks (```) and others with four (````). Markdown doesn’t treat the code block any differently with four backticks, so there is no value to the inconsistency. I replaced uses of four backticks with three, as three backticks is the most commonly-used syntax.
bcoe
approved these changes
May 6, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some Markdown code blocks were defined with three backticks (
```) and others with four (````). Markdown doesn’t treat the code block any differently with four backticks, so there is no value to the inconsistency. I replaced uses of four backticks with three, as three backticks is the most commonly-used syntax.