New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Scan benchmark #23
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good. Will merge once CI checks complete.
for (auto _ : state) { | ||
uint32_t tuples_read = 0; | ||
auto start_pos = table_->begin(storage::layout_version_t(0)); | ||
while (tuples_read != num_inserts_) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we using this conditional rather than the more canonical “!= table_.end()” construct?
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## schema_change #23 +/- ##
==============================================
Coverage 89.32% 89.32%
==============================================
Files 118 118
Lines 4610 4610
==============================================
Hits 4118 4118
Misses 492 492
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
SingleVersionScan
MultiVersionScan