Ensure reasonable values for passno in fstab (bsc#1078703) #620
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ancorgs
force-pushed
the
passno
branch
5 times, most recently
from
30f7612
to
bc59fe9
Compare
Is not used (it creates a useless MountPoint associated to nothing in the devicegraph). It was simply added to the original wrapper with no use case.
ancorgs
force-pushed
the
passno
branch
2 times, most recently
from
edaa1e0
to
97cedb3
Compare
ancorgs
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implements https://trello.com/c/yzueuWcq/256-1-propose-correct-better-mount-options-for
Manually tested for an ext4 installation (fs_passno correctly set to 1) and a Btrfs one (correctly set to 0)