rake_task.rb:9-10: We need to create implementation of... #125

0pdd · 2019-07-09T05:40:45Z

The puzzle 114-b69d9185 from #114 has to be resolved:

https://github.com/yegor256/pdd/blob/5a9c16ff2c130e1efc5fefee31b91437b29b9a91/lib/pdd/rake_task.rb#L9-L10

The puzzle was created by @yegor256 on 09-Jul-19.

Estimate: 30 minutes, role: DEV.

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:

0pdd · 2019-07-09T05:40:46Z

I can't create GitHub labels pdd. Most likely I don't have necessary permissions to yegor256/pdd repository. Please, make sure @0pdd user is in the list of collaborators:

POST https://api.github.com/repos/yegor256/pdd/labels: 404 - Not Found // See: https://developer.github.com/v3/issues/labels/#create-a-label
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/octokit-4.14.0/lib/octokit/response/raise_error.rb:16:in `on_complete'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/faraday-0.15.4/lib/faraday/response.rb:9:in `block in call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/faraday-0.15.4/lib/faraday/response.rb:61:in `on_complete'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/faraday-0.15.4/lib/faraday/response.rb:8:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/octokit-4.14.0/lib/octokit/middleware/follow_redirects.rb:73:in `perform_with_redirection'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/octokit-4.14.0/lib/octokit/middleware/follow_redirects.rb:61:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/faraday-0.15.4/lib/faraday/request/retry.rb:128:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/faraday-0.15.4/lib/faraday/rack_builder.rb:143:in `build_response'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/faraday-0.15.4/lib/faraday/connection.rb:387:in `run_request'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/faraday-0.15.4/lib/faraday/connection.rb:175:in `post'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sawyer-0.8.2/lib/sawyer/agent.rb:94:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/octokit-4.14.0/lib/octokit/connection.rb:156:in `request'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/octokit-4.14.0/lib/octokit/connection.rb:28:in `post'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/octokit-4.14.0/lib/octokit/client/labels.rb:44:in `add_label'
/app/objects/github_tagged_tickets.rb:50:in `block in submit'
/app/objects/github_tagged_tickets.rb:50:in `each'
/app/objects/github_tagged_tickets.rb:50:in `submit'
/app/objects/commit_tickets.rb:38:in `submit'
/app/objects/emailed_tickets.rb:35:in `submit'
/app/objects/sentry_tickets.rb:46:in `submit'
/app/objects/puzzles.rb:89:in `block in expose'
/app/objects/puzzles.rb:80:in `loop'
/app/objects/puzzles.rb:80:in `expose'
/app/objects/puzzles.rb:33:in `deploy'
/app/objects/job.rb:38:in `proceed'
/app/objects/job_starred.rb:33:in `proceed'
/app/objects/job_recorded.rb:32:in `proceed'
/app/objects/job_emailed.rb:35:in `proceed'
/app/objects/job_commiterrors.rb:36:in `proceed'
/app/objects/job_detached.rb:48:in `exclusive'
/app/objects/job_detached.rb:36:in `block in proceed'
/app/objects/job_detached.rb:36:in `fork'
/app/objects/job_detached.rb:36:in `proceed'
/app/0pdd.rb:358:in `block in <top (required)>'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1635:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1635:in `block in compile!'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:992:in `block (3 levels) in route!'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1011:in `route_eval'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:992:in `block (2 levels) in route!'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1040:in `block in process_route'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1038:in `catch'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1038:in `process_route'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:990:in `block in route!'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:989:in `each'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:989:in `route!'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1097:in `block in dispatch!'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1076:in `block in invoke'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1076:in `catch'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1076:in `invoke'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1094:in `dispatch!'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:924:in `block in call!'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1076:in `block in invoke'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1076:in `catch'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1076:in `invoke'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:924:in `call!'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:913:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-protection-2.0.4/lib/rack/protection/xss_header.rb:18:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-protection-2.0.4/lib/rack/protection/path_traversal.rb:16:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-protection-2.0.4/lib/rack/protection/json_csrf.rb:26:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-protection-2.0.4/lib/rack/protection/base.rb:50:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-protection-2.0.4/lib/rack/protection/base.rb:50:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-protection-2.0.4/lib/rack/protection/frame_options.rb:31:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-2.0.6/lib/rack/logger.rb:15:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-2.0.6/lib/rack/common_logger.rb:33:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:231:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:224:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-2.0.6/lib/rack/head.rb:12:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-2.0.6/lib/rack/method_override.rb:22:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:194:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1957:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1502:in `block in call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1729:in `synchronize'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/sinatra-2.0.4/lib/sinatra/base.rb:1502:in `call'
/app/vendor/bundle/ruby/2.6.0/gems/rack-2.0.6/lib/rack/handler/webrick.rb:86:in `service'
/app/vendor/ruby-2.6.0/lib/ruby/2.6.0/webrick/httpserver.rb:140:in `service'
/app/vendor/ruby-2.6.0/lib/ruby/2.6.0/webrick/httpserver.rb:96:in `run'
/app/vendor/ruby-2.6.0/lib/ruby/2.6.0/webrick/server.rb:307:in `block in start_thread'

0crat · 2019-07-09T05:41:46Z

@yegor256 /z please, pay attention to this issue

yegor256 · 2019-07-09T05:42:45Z

@0crat assign @aivinog1

0crat · 2019-07-09T05:49:17Z

@0crat assign @aivinog1 (here)

@yegor256 The job #125 assigned to @aivinog1 /z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; @aivinog1 /z is not a member of this project yet, but they can request to join, as §1 explains; there will be no monetary reward for this job

0crat · 2019-07-09T05:57:24Z

Manual assignment of issues is discouraged, see §19: -5 point(s) just awarded to @yegor256 /z

0pdd · 2019-07-11T08:19:36Z

The puzzle 114-b69d9185 has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

0pdd · 2019-07-11T08:19:47Z

@0pdd 2 puzzles #132, #133 are still not solved.

aivinog1 · 2019-07-11T09:14:20Z

@yegor256 Why @0crat didn't add my reputation points to closing this issue? I can still see this job on my Zerocracy agenda.

0crat · 2019-07-11T09:14:27Z

Are you speaking to me or about me here; you must always start your message with my name if you want to address it to me, see §1

aivinog1 · 2019-07-11T10:15:51Z

@0crat status

0crat · 2019-07-11T12:09:34Z

@dennis00010011b /z please review this job completed by @aivinog1 /z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

0crat · 2019-07-11T12:18:00Z

@0crat status (here)

@aivinog1 This is what I know about this job in C3T46CUJJ, as in §32:

The job #125 is in scope for 2days
The role is DEV
The job is not assigned to anyone
The budget is not set yet
These users are banned and won't be assigned:
- @0pdd /z: This user reported the ticket
The job is waiting quality review verdict by @dennis00010011b /z for 21min
@aivinog1 /z will receive 30 minutes after quality review
Job footprint (restricted area)

0crat · 2019-07-11T12:18:05Z

Job #125 is not in the agenda of @aivinog1 /z, can't inspect

0crat · 2019-07-11T12:18:06Z

The job #125 is now out of scope

aivinog1 · 2019-07-13T01:58:17Z

@0crat status

0crat · 2019-07-13T02:00:20Z

@0crat status (here)

@aivinog1 This is what I know about this job in C3T46CUJJ, as in §32:

The job #125 is not in scope
The job is waiting quality review verdict by @dennis00010011b /z for 2days
@aivinog1 /z will receive 30 minutes after quality review
Job footprint (restricted area)

aivinog1 · 2019-07-16T01:08:54Z

@0crat status

0crat · 2019-07-16T01:09:29Z

@0crat status (here)

@aivinog1 This is what I know about this job in C3T46CUJJ, as in §32:

The job #125 is not in scope
The job is waiting quality review verdict by @dennis00010011b /z for 5days
@aivinog1 /z will receive 30 minutes after quality review
Job footprint (restricted area)

aivinog1 · 2019-07-16T01:18:31Z

@yegor256 Hm, I've seen @dennis00010011b profile in Zerocracy(https://www.0crat.com/u/dennis00010011b) and I see that he has a reputation of None. The I've checked Team page(https://www.0crat.com/team) and I could not find a user with such username. After all of that, I think that review would not have been done. Can you remove this user from the project?

aivinog1 · 2019-07-18T03:44:27Z

@0crat status

0crat · 2019-07-18T03:47:02Z

@0crat status (here)

@aivinog1 This is what I know about this job in C3T46CUJJ, as in §32:

The job #125 is not in scope
The job is waiting quality review verdict by @dennis00010011b /z for 7days
@aivinog1 /z will receive 30 minutes after quality review
Job footprint (restricted area)

aivinog1 · 2019-07-18T03:48:09Z

@yegor256 Hm, I've seen @dennis00010011b profile in Zerocracy(https://www.0crat.com/u/dennis00010011b) and I see that he has a reputation of None. The I've checked Team page(https://www.0crat.com/team) and I could not find a user with such username. After all of that, I think that review would not have been done. Can you remove this user from the project?

@yegor256 What do you think about it?

aivinog1 · 2019-07-19T12:46:19Z

@yegor256 ping

yegor256 · 2019-07-28T10:09:08Z

@0crat quality good

0crat · 2019-07-28T11:10:02Z

Order was finished, quality is "good": +35 point(s) just awarded to @aivinog1 /z

0crat · 2019-07-28T11:10:06Z

Quality review completed: +4 point(s) just awarded to @yegor256 /z

0pdd referenced this issue Jul 9, 2019

#124 fixed and tested

5a9c16f

0pdd mentioned this issue Jul 9, 2019

Rake task #114

Closed

0crat added the scope label Jul 9, 2019

aivinog1 pushed a commit to aivinog1/pdd that referenced this issue Jul 10, 2019

cqfn#125 Add parsing the name parameter from the rake task.

9ff4023

aivinog1 mentioned this issue Jul 10, 2019

#125 Add parsing the name parameter from the rake task. #131

Merged

0pdd closed this as completed Jul 11, 2019

This was referenced Jul 11, 2019

rake_task.rb:10-12: Needs to have more parameters to run... #132

Closed

rake_task.rb:24-26: need to implement this method. For... #133

Closed

0crat removed the scope label Jul 11, 2019

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

rake_task.rb:9-10: We need to create implementation of... #125

rake_task.rb:9-10: We need to create implementation of... #125

0pdd commented Jul 9, 2019

0pdd commented Jul 9, 2019

0crat commented Jul 9, 2019

yegor256 commented Jul 9, 2019

0crat commented Jul 9, 2019

0crat commented Jul 9, 2019

0pdd commented Jul 11, 2019

0pdd commented Jul 11, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 11, 2019 •

edited

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 11, 2019

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 13, 2019

0crat commented Jul 13, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 16, 2019

0crat commented Jul 16, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 16, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 18, 2019

0crat commented Jul 18, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 18, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 19, 2019

yegor256 commented Jul 28, 2019

0crat commented Jul 28, 2019

0crat commented Jul 28, 2019

rake_task.rb:9-10: We need to create implementation of... #125

rake_task.rb:9-10: We need to create implementation of... #125

Comments

0pdd commented Jul 9, 2019

0pdd commented Jul 9, 2019

0crat commented Jul 9, 2019

yegor256 commented Jul 9, 2019

0crat commented Jul 9, 2019

0crat commented Jul 9, 2019

0pdd commented Jul 11, 2019

0pdd commented Jul 11, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 11, 2019 • edited

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 11, 2019

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

0crat commented Jul 11, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 13, 2019

0crat commented Jul 13, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 16, 2019

0crat commented Jul 16, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 16, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 18, 2019

0crat commented Jul 18, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 18, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 19, 2019

yegor256 commented Jul 28, 2019

0crat commented Jul 28, 2019

0crat commented Jul 28, 2019

aivinog1 commented Jul 11, 2019 •

edited