Checkstyle and PMD rules overlap

[krzyk]

Following checkstyle rules are equivalent of our PMD rules:

Checkstyle	PMD
JavaNCSS (method and class)	NcssMethodCount, NcssConstructorCount, NcssTypeCount
CyclomaticComplexity	CyclomaticComplexity, StdCyclomaticComplexity, ModifiedCyclomaticComplexity
NPathComplexity	NPathComplexity
MethodLength	ExcessiveMethodLength
IllegalCatch	AvoidCatchingGenericException
UnusedImports	UnusedImports
FinalLocalVariableCheck	LocalVariableCouldBeFinal

Please remove the checkstyle ones and make sure that PMD ones have at least the same threshold as the removed checkstyle checks (that is, we don't reduce code quality).

[krzyk]

@davvd valid bug

[davvd]

@davvd valid bug

@krzyk I added bug tag to this ticket

[davvd]

@krzyk many thanks for the bug report, I added 30 mins to your acc, transaction 87842351

[krzyk]

@davvd this is postponed

[davvd]

@davvd this is postponed

@krzyk OK, I put "postponed" label here

[davvd]

@davvd this is postponed

@krzyk right, I will find someone else, no problem

[krzyk]

@0crat in

[0crat]

@0crat in (here)

@krzyk Job #772 is now in scope, role is DEV

[0crat]

Bug was reported, see §29: +15 point(s) just awarded to @krzyk/z

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at this job; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV are banned at #772; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #772; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #772; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #772; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #772; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[0crat]

@krzyk/z everybody who has role DEV is banned at #772; I won't be able to assign anyone automatically; consider assigning someone manually (as in §19), or invite more people (as in §51), or remove the job from the scope (as in §14)

[krzyk]

@paulodamaso If you have some free time, this issue is quite frustrating

[paulodamaso]

@krzyk I'm on it

[krzyk]

@0crat assign @paulodamaso

[0crat]

@0crat assign @paulodamaso (here)

@krzyk The job #772 assigned to @paulodamaso/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be no monetary reward for this job

[0crat]

Manual assignment of issues is discouraged, see §19: -5 point(s) just awarded to @krzyk/z

[krzyk]

@paulodamaso thanks

[0crat]

@ypshenychka/z please review this job completed by @paulodamaso/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

[0crat]

The job #772 is now out of scope

[ypshenychka]

@0crat quality good

[0crat]

Order was finished, quality is "good": +35 point(s) just awarded to @paulodamaso/z

[0crat]

Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @ypshenychka/z