the most obvious spelling mistakes

policyText/CCA.txt

@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ This agreement is between you, being a registered member ("Member") within CAcer
 [{&DRP}] is the policy and rules for resolving disputes.
 [USE] means the act by your software to conduct its tasks, incorporating the certificates according to software procedures.
 [RELY] means your human act in taking on a risk and liability on the basis of the claim(s) bound within a certificate.
-[OFFER] means the your act of making available your certificate to another person. Generally, you install and configure your software to act as your agent and facilite this and other tasks. OFFER does not imply suggestion of reliance.
+[OFFER] means the your act of making available your certificate to another person. Generally, you install and configure your software to act as your agent and facilitate this and other tasks. OFFER does not imply suggestion of reliance.
 [Issue] means creation of a certificate by CAcert. To create a certificate, CAcert affixes a digital signature from the root onto a public key and other information. This act would generally bind a statement or claim, such as your name, to your key.
 [Root] means CAcert's top level key, used for signing certificates for Members. In this document, the term includes any subroots.
 [CAcert Official Document ("COD")] is an official managed and controlled document (e. g. a Policy) of CAcert.
@@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ As part of the Community, CAcert offers you these rights:
 #2. You may RELY on any certificate issued by CAcert, as explained and limited by the {&CPS}.
 #3. You may OFFER certificates issued to you by CAcert to Members for their RELIANCE.
 #4. You may OFFER certificates issued to you by CAcert to NRPs for their USE, within the general {&Principles}.
-#5. This Licence is free of cost, non-exclusive, and non-transferrable.
+#5. This Licence is free of cost, non-exclusive, and non-transferable.
 
 == 1.3 Your Contributions ==
 
-You agree to a non-exclusive non-restrictive non-revokable transfer of Licence to CAcert for your contributions. That is, if you post an idea or comment on a CAcert forum, or email it to other Members, your work can be used freely by the Community for CAcert purposes, including placing under CAcert's licences for wider publication.
+You agree to a non-exclusive non-restrictive non-revocable transfer of Licence to CAcert for your contributions. That is, if you post an idea or comment on a CAcert forum, or email it to other Members, your work can be used freely by the Community for CAcert purposes, including placing under CAcert's licences for wider publication.
 
 You retain authorship rights, and the rights to also transfer non-exclusive rights to other parties. That is, you can still use your ideas and contributions outside the Community.
 

policyText/CCS.txt

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ The {&CCS} controls and tracks those documents, processes and assets which are c
 
 This document is the procedure for CCS. This document itself is a component of the CCS, see §2. All other documentation and process specified within is derivative and is ruled by the CCS.
 
-CCS is formated, inspired and designed to meet the needs of David Ross Criteria - Certificate Authority Review Checklist - section A.1 (DRC-A.1) CCS may be seen as the index to systems audit under DRC.
+CCS is formatted, inspired and designed to meet the needs of David Ross Criteria - Certificate Authority Review Checklist - section A.1 (DRC-A.1) CCS may be seen as the index to systems audit under DRC.
 = 1 Documents =
 == 1.1 Controlled Document List ==
 
@@ -83,4 +83,3 @@ Changes and access to critical member data is as defined under {&AP}, {&CCA} and
 == 6.3 Archive ==
 
 Data retention is controlled by {&SP} and {&CCA}.
-

policyText/DRP.txt

@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ As a matter of public policy, courts will generally refer any case back to Arbit
 
 When an external court claims and asserts its jurisdiction, and issues a court order, subpoena or other service to CAcert, the CM files the order as a dispute, with the external court as Claimant. The CM and other support staff are granted no authority to act on the basis of any court order, and ordinarily must await the order of the Arbitrator (which might simply be a repeat of the external court order).
 
-The Arbitrator establishes the bona fides of the court, and rules. The Arbitrator may rule to reject the order, for jurisdiction or other reasons. By way of example, if all Parties are Members, then jurisdiction more normally falls within the forum. If the Arbitrator rules to reject, he should do so only after consulting with CAcert Inc. counsel. The Arbitrator's jurisidiction is ordinarily that of dealing with the order, and not that which the external court has claimed to.
+The Arbitrator establishes the bona fides of the court, and rules. The Arbitrator may rule to reject the order, for jurisdiction or other reasons. By way of example, if all Parties are Members, then jurisdiction more normally falls within the forum. If the Arbitrator rules to reject, he should do so only after consulting with CAcert Inc. counsel. The Arbitrator's jurisdiction is ordinarily that of dealing with the order, and not that which the external court has claimed to.
 
 == 2.6 Process ==
 
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ If a person who is not a Member is a party to the dispute, then the Ruling is no
 
 == 3.4 Review for Appeal ==
 
-In the eventof clear injustices, egregious behaviour or unconscionable Rulings, a review may be requested by filing a dispute. The new Arbitrator reviews the new dispute, re-examines and reviews the entire case, then rules on whether the case may be re-opened or not.
+In the event of clear injustices, egregious behaviour or unconscionable Rulings, a review may be requested by filing a dispute. The new Arbitrator reviews the new dispute, re-examines and reviews the entire case, then rules on whether the case may be re-opened or not.
 
 If the Review Arbitrator rules the case be re-opened, then the Review Arbitrator refers the case to an Appeal Panel of 3. The Appeal Panel is led by a Senior Arbitrator, and is formed according to procedures established by the DRO from time to time. The Appeal Panel hears the case and delivers a final and binding Ruling.
 

policyText/SP.txt

@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ All physical accesses are logged and reported to all.
 There must not be a procedure for emergency access. If, in the judgement of the Systems Administrator, emergency access is required and gained, in order to avoid a greater harm, independent authorisation before the Arbitrator must be sought as soon as possible. See {&DRP}.
 === 2.3.5 Physical Security codes & devices ===
 
-All personel who are in possession of physical security codes and devices (keys) are to be authorised and documented.
+All personnel who are in possession of physical security codes and devices (keys) are to be authorised and documented.
 = 3 Logical Security =
 == 3.1 Network ==
 === 3.1.1 Infrastructure ===
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ The following privacy considerations exist:
 * interview, documents should not be public,
 * summary of evidence should be in the ruling.
 * Arbitrator can rule on the escrow questions of evidence
-* contact information goes into the contact addressbook
+* contact information goes into the contact address book
 
 CAcert trusted roles give up some privacy for the privacy of others.
 === 9.1.5 Authorisation ===