Added source context to feeds where it was missing #914
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tomchop
approved these changes
Nov 30, 2023
|
This is awesome, thanks a lot! |
fixe error
|
Thanks a lot ! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some of the feeds were missing a source being defined in their context. Made it hard to identify what feed a potentially bad observable was originating from. I have gone through and added the source field to each of the feed scripts I could find where it was missing. Black also adjusted the formatting on the imports automatically. If you'd like me to remove that formatting I can change back and resubmit.