Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Usage with custom object serialization #1

Open
sburnicki opened this issue Jul 28, 2014 · 1 comment
Open

Usage with custom object serialization #1

sburnicki opened this issue Jul 28, 2014 · 1 comment

Comments

@sburnicki
Copy link

Hi,

is it possible to use this framework but not use the default MsgPack object serialization?
I use the MsgPack c# bindings but use for all objects a customer serializer. But when I use the DynamicProxy for example, the framework would use the default MsgPack serialization.

So there some API to pass byte[] and only take advantage of the communication features?

Thanks!

@yfakariya
Copy link
Owner

Sorry, there are no public APIs to use custom serializer other than msgpack.

2014-07-28 18:18 GMT+09:00 sburnicki notifications@github.com:

Hi,

is it possible to use this framework but not use the default MsgPack
object serialization?
I use the MsgPack c# bindings but use for all objects a customer
serializer. But when I use the DynamicProxy for example, the framework
would use the default MsgPack serialization.

So there some API to pass byte[] and only take advantage of the
communication features?

Thanks!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#1.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants