Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve code coverage #61

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2023
Merged

Improve code coverage #61

merged 2 commits into from
May 8, 2023

Conversation

darkdef
Copy link
Contributor

@darkdef darkdef commented May 8, 2023

Q A
Is bugfix?
New feature?
Breaks BC?

@what-the-diff
Copy link

what-the-diff bot commented May 8, 2023

PR Summary

  • Added Test for Write Method Error
    A new test has been incorporated to check for any issues in the write method, enhancing the overall reliability of the code.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 8, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage has no change and project coverage change: +0.44 🎉

Comparison is base (83d712f) 99.11% compared to head (9ecc91b) 99.55%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master      #61      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     99.11%   99.55%   +0.44%     
  Complexity       43       43              
============================================
  Files             2        2              
  Lines           226      226              
============================================
+ Hits            224      225       +1     
+ Misses            2        1       -1     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@darkdef darkdef merged commit 2bb84d2 into master May 8, 2023
152 checks passed
@darkdef darkdef deleted the improve-code-coverage branch May 8, 2023 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants