New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A question in Table 1: Results on CNNDM. #1
Comments
Thanks for your interest in our work! In Table 1, the max oracle is built by selecting the best candidate (highest ROUGE score) from the generated summaries. Therefore, it is not trained by contrastive learning. |
I would like to ask that the best performance can be obtained by choosing the highest rouge among all candidates, why do we need the second stage of contrastive learning? |
As ROUGE scores are computed between the reference summaries and generated summaries, the Max Oracle is not really a model itself (since it has access to the reference). A model, like the evaluation model in our work, needs to select the candidates based on the candidates and the source documents. |
Thanks a lllllot!!! I think i have been get the "reference-free" idea! |
Thanks for your insightful work. However, I am confused by some details in the Table 1.
Is the model which derives the 'Max' result also trained by contrastive learning ? or simply sampled from different beam search process?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: