Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A question in Table 1: Results on CNNDM. #1

Closed
Doragd opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 4 comments
Closed

A question in Table 1: Results on CNNDM. #1

Doragd opened this issue Jun 8, 2021 · 4 comments

Comments

@Doragd
Copy link

Doragd commented Jun 8, 2021

Thanks for your insightful work. However, I am confused by some details in the Table 1.
Is the model which derives the 'Max' result also trained by contrastive learning ? or simply sampled from different beam search process?

@yixinL7
Copy link
Owner

yixinL7 commented Jun 8, 2021

Thanks for your interest in our work! In Table 1, the max oracle is built by selecting the best candidate (highest ROUGE score) from the generated summaries. Therefore, it is not trained by contrastive learning.

@Doragd
Copy link
Author

Doragd commented Jun 9, 2021

I would like to ask that the best performance can be obtained by choosing the highest rouge among all candidates, why do we need the second stage of contrastive learning?

@yixinL7
Copy link
Owner

yixinL7 commented Jun 9, 2021

As ROUGE scores are computed between the reference summaries and generated summaries, the Max Oracle is not really a model itself (since it has access to the reference). A model, like the evaluation model in our work, needs to select the candidates based on the candidates and the source documents.

@Doragd
Copy link
Author

Doragd commented Jun 9, 2021

Thanks a lllllot!!! I think i have been get the "reference-free" idea!

@Doragd Doragd closed this as completed Jun 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants