Merge pull request Codium-ai#546 from Codium-ai/tr/backticks_review

Single-label for suggestions

docs/IMPROVE.md

@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Under the section 'pr_code_suggestions', the [configuration file](./../pr_agent/
 - `num_code_suggestions`: number of code suggestions provided by the 'improve' tool. Default is 4.
 - `extra_instructions`: Optional extra instructions to the tool. For example: "focus on the changes in the file X. Ignore change in ...".
 - `rank_suggestions`: if set to true, the tool will rank the suggestions, based on importance. Default is false.
+- `include_improved_code`: if set to true, the tool will include an improved code implementation in the suggestion. Default is true.
 
 #### params for '/improve --extended' mode
 - `num_code_suggestions_per_chunk`: number of code suggestions provided by the 'improve' tool, per chunk. Default is 8.

pr_agent/algo/pr_processing.py

@@ -264,65 +264,73 @@ def _get_all_deployments(all_models: List[str]) -> List[str]:
 
 def find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file(diff_files: List[FilePatchInfo],
                                               relevant_file: str,
-                                              relevant_line_in_file: str) -> Tuple[int, int]:
-    """
-    Find the line number and absolute position of a relevant line in a file.
-
-    Args:
-        diff_files (List[FilePatchInfo]): A list of FilePatchInfo objects representing the patches of files.
-        relevant_file (str): The name of the file where the relevant line is located.
-        relevant_line_in_file (str): The content of the relevant line.
-
-    Returns:
-        Tuple[int, int]: A tuple containing the line number and absolute position of the relevant line in the file.
-    """
+                                              relevant_line_in_file: str,
+                                              absolute_position: int = None) -> Tuple[int, int]:
     position = -1
-    absolute_position = -1
+    if absolute_position is None:
+        absolute_position = -1
     re_hunk_header = re.compile(
         r"^@@ -(\d+)(?:,(\d+))? \+(\d+)(?:,(\d+))? @@[ ]?(.*)")
 
     for file in diff_files:
         if file.filename and (file.filename.strip() == relevant_file):
             patch = file.patch
             patch_lines = patch.splitlines()
-
-            # try to find the line in the patch using difflib, with some margin of error
-            matches_difflib: list[str | Any] = difflib.get_close_matches(relevant_line_in_file,
-                                                                         patch_lines, n=3, cutoff=0.93)
-            if len(matches_difflib) == 1 and matches_difflib[0].startswith('+'):
-                relevant_line_in_file = matches_difflib[0]
-
             delta = 0
             start1, size1, start2, size2 = 0, 0, 0, 0
-            for i, line in enumerate(patch_lines):
-                if line.startswith('@@'):
-                    delta = 0
-                    match = re_hunk_header.match(line)
-                    start1, size1, start2, size2 = map(int, match.groups()[:4])
-                elif not line.startswith('-'):
-                    delta += 1
-
-                if relevant_line_in_file in line and line[0] != '-':
-                    position = i
-                    absolute_position = start2 + delta - 1
-                    break
-
-            if position == -1 and relevant_line_in_file[0] == '+':
-                no_plus_line = relevant_line_in_file[1:].lstrip()
+            if absolute_position != -1: # matching absolute to relative
                 for i, line in enumerate(patch_lines):
+                    # new hunk
                     if line.startswith('@@'):
                         delta = 0
                         match = re_hunk_header.match(line)
                         start1, size1, start2, size2 = map(int, match.groups()[:4])
                     elif not line.startswith('-'):
                         delta += 1
 
-                    if no_plus_line in line and line[0] != '-':
-                        # The model might add a '+' to the beginning of the relevant_line_in_file even if originally
-                        # it's a context line
+                    #
+                    absolute_position_curr = start2 + delta - 1
+
+                    if absolute_position_curr == absolute_position:
+                        position = i
+                        break
+            else:
+                # try to find the line in the patch using difflib, with some margin of error
+                matches_difflib: list[str | Any] = difflib.get_close_matches(relevant_line_in_file,
+                                                                             patch_lines, n=3, cutoff=0.93)
+                if len(matches_difflib) == 1 and matches_difflib[0].startswith('+'):
+                    relevant_line_in_file = matches_difflib[0]
+
+
+                for i, line in enumerate(patch_lines):
+                    if line.startswith('@@'):
+                        delta = 0
+                        match = re_hunk_header.match(line)
+                        start1, size1, start2, size2 = map(int, match.groups()[:4])
+                    elif not line.startswith('-'):
+                        delta += 1
+
+                    if relevant_line_in_file in line and line[0] != '-':
                         position = i
                         absolute_position = start2 + delta - 1
                         break
+
+                if position == -1 and relevant_line_in_file[0] == '+':
+                    no_plus_line = relevant_line_in_file[1:].lstrip()
+                    for i, line in enumerate(patch_lines):
+                        if line.startswith('@@'):
+                            delta = 0
+                            match = re_hunk_header.match(line)
+                            start1, size1, start2, size2 = map(int, match.groups()[:4])
+                        elif not line.startswith('-'):
+                            delta += 1
+
+                        if no_plus_line in line and line[0] != '-':
+                            # The model might add a '+' to the beginning of the relevant_line_in_file even if originally
+                            # it's a context line
+                            position = i
+                            absolute_position = start2 + delta - 1
+                            break
     return position, absolute_position
 
 

pr_agent/git_providers/azuredevops_provider.py

@@ -174,9 +174,6 @@ def remove_initial_comment(self):
     def publish_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
         raise NotImplementedError("Azure DevOps provider does not support publishing inline comment yet")
 
-    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
-        raise NotImplementedError("Azure DevOps provider does not support creating inline comments yet")
-
     def publish_inline_comments(self, comments: list[dict]):
         raise NotImplementedError("Azure DevOps provider does not support publishing inline comments yet")
 

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_provider.py

@@ -201,8 +201,10 @@ def remove_comment(self, comment):
             get_logger().exception(f"Failed to remove comment, error: {e}")
 
     # funtion to create_inline_comment
-    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
-        position, absolute_position = find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file(self.get_diff_files(), relevant_file.strip('`'), relevant_line_in_file)
+    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str, absolute_position: int = None):
+        position, absolute_position = find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file(self.get_diff_files(),
+                                                                            relevant_file.strip('`'),
+                                                                            relevant_line_in_file, absolute_position)
         if position == -1:
             if get_settings().config.verbosity_level >= 2:
                 get_logger().info(f"Could not find position for {relevant_file} {relevant_line_in_file}")

pr_agent/git_providers/bitbucket_server_provider.py

@@ -210,11 +210,14 @@ def remove_comment(self, comment):
         pass
 
     # funtion to create_inline_comment
-    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
+    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str,
+                              absolute_position: int = None):
+
         position, absolute_position = find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file(
             self.get_diff_files(),
             relevant_file.strip('`'),
-            relevant_line_in_file
+            relevant_line_in_file,
+            absolute_position
         )
         if position == -1:
             if get_settings().config.verbosity_level >= 2:

pr_agent/git_providers/codecommit_provider.py

@@ -229,9 +229,6 @@ def publish_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in
         # https://boto3.amazonaws.com/v1/documentation/api/latest/reference/services/codecommit/client/post_comment_for_compared_commit.html
         raise NotImplementedError("CodeCommit provider does not support publishing inline comments yet")
 
-    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
-        raise NotImplementedError("CodeCommit provider does not support creating inline comments yet")
-
     def publish_inline_comments(self, comments: list[dict]):
         raise NotImplementedError("CodeCommit provider does not support publishing inline comments yet")
 

pr_agent/git_providers/gerrit_provider.py

@@ -380,11 +380,6 @@ def publish_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str,
             'Publishing inline comments is not implemented for the gerrit '
             'provider')
 
-    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str,
-                              relevant_line_in_file: str):
-        raise NotImplementedError(
-            'Creating inline comments is not implemented for the gerrit '
-            'provider')
 
     def publish_labels(self, labels):
         # Not applicable to the local git provider,

pr_agent/git_providers/git_provider.py

@@ -106,9 +106,9 @@ def publish_persistent_comment(self, pr_comment: str, initial_header: str, updat
     def publish_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
         pass
 
-    @abstractmethod
-    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
-        pass
+    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str,
+                              absolute_position: int = None):
+        raise NotImplementedError("This git provider does not support creating inline comments yet")
 
     @abstractmethod
     def publish_inline_comments(self, comments: list[dict]):

pr_agent/git_providers/github_provider.py

@@ -206,8 +206,12 @@ def publish_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in
         self.publish_inline_comments([self.create_inline_comment(body, relevant_file, relevant_line_in_file)])
 
 
-    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
-        position, absolute_position = find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file(self.diff_files, relevant_file.strip('`'), relevant_line_in_file)
+    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str,
+                              absolute_position: int = None):
+        position, absolute_position = find_line_number_of_relevant_line_in_file(self.diff_files,
+                                                                                relevant_file.strip('`'),
+                                                                                relevant_line_in_file,
+                                                                                absolute_position)
         if position == -1:
             if get_settings().config.verbosity_level >= 2:
                 get_logger().info(f"Could not find position for {relevant_file} {relevant_line_in_file}")

pr_agent/git_providers/gitlab_provider.py

@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ def publish_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in
         self.send_inline_comment(body, edit_type, found, relevant_file, relevant_line_in_file, source_line_no,
                                  target_file, target_line_no)
 
-    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
+    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str, absolute_position: int = None):
         raise NotImplementedError("Gitlab provider does not support creating inline comments yet")
 
     def create_inline_comments(self, comments: list[dict]):

pr_agent/git_providers/local_git_provider.py

@@ -121,9 +121,6 @@ def publish_comment(self, pr_comment: str, is_temporary: bool = False):
     def publish_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
         raise NotImplementedError('Publishing inline comments is not implemented for the local git provider')
 
-    def create_inline_comment(self, body: str, relevant_file: str, relevant_line_in_file: str):
-        raise NotImplementedError('Creating inline comments is not implemented for the local git provider')
-
     def publish_inline_comments(self, comments: list[dict]):
         raise NotImplementedError('Publishing inline comments is not implemented for the local git provider')
 

pr_agent/settings/configuration.toml

@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ include_generated_by_header=true
 [pr_code_suggestions] # /improve #
 num_code_suggestions=4
 summarize = false
+include_improved_code = true
 extra_instructions = ""
 rank_suggestions = false
 # params for '/improve --extended' mode

pr_agent/settings/pr_code_suggestions_prompts.toml

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ __old hunk__
 
 Specific instructions:
 - Provide up to {{ num_code_suggestions }} code suggestions. Try to provide diverse and insightful suggestions.
-- Prioritize suggestions that address major problems, issues and bugs in the code. As a second priority, suggestions should focus on best practices, code readability, maintainability, enhancments, performance, and other aspects.
+- Prioritize suggestions that address major problems, issues and bugs in the code. As a second priority, suggestions should focus on enhancment, best practice, performance, maintainability, and other aspects.
 - Don't suggest to add docstring, type hints, or comments.
 - Suggestions should refer only to code from the '__new hunk__' sections, and focus on new lines of code (lines starting with '+').
 - Avoid making suggestions that have already been implemented in the PR code. For example, if you want to add logs, or change a variable to const, or anything else, make sure it isn't already in the '__new hunk__' code.
@@ -49,65 +49,41 @@ Extra instructions from the user:
 ======
 {%- endif %}
 
+The output must be a YAML object equivalent to type PRCodeSuggestions, according to the following Pydantic definitions:
+=====
+class CodeSuggestion(BaseModel):
+    relevant_file: str = Field(description="the relevant file full path")
+    suggestion_content: str = Field(description="an actionable suggestion for meaningfully improving the new code introduced in the PR")
+    existing_code: str = Field(description="a code snippet, showing the relevant code lines from a '__new hunk__' section. It must be contiguous, correctly formatted and indented, and without line numbers")
+    relevant_lines_start: int = Field(description="The relevant line number, from a '__new hunk__' section, where the suggestion starts (inclusive). Should be derived from the hunk line numbers, and correspond to the 'existing code' snippet above")
+    relevant_lines_end: int = Field(description="The relevant line number, from a '__new hunk__' section, where the suggestion ends (inclusive). Should be derived from the hunk line numbers, and correspond to the 'existing code' snippet above")
+    improved_code: str = Field(description="a new code snippet, that can be used to replace the relevant lines in '__new hunk__' code. Replacement suggestions should be complete, correctly formatted and indented, and without line numbers")
+    label: str = Field(description="a single label for the suggestion, to help the user understand the suggestion type. For example: 'security', 'bug', 'performance', 'enhancement', 'possible issue', 'best practice', 'maintainability', etc. Other labels are also allowed")
+
+class PRCodeSuggestions(BaseModel):
+    code_suggestions: List[CodeSuggestion]
+=====
 
-You must use the following YAML schema to format your answer:
-```yaml
-Code suggestions:
-  type: array
-  minItems: 1
-  maxItems: {{ num_code_suggestions }}
-  uniqueItems: true
-  items:
-    relevant file:
-      type: string
-      description: the relevant file full path
-    suggestion content:
-      type: string
-      description: |-
-        a concrete suggestion for meaningfully improving the new PR code.
-    existing code:
-      type: string
-      description: |-
-        a code snippet showing the relevant code lines from a '__new hunk__' section.
-        It must be contiguous, correctly formatted and indented, and without line numbers.
-    relevant lines start:
-      type: integer
-      description: |-
-        The relevant line number from a '__new hunk__' section where the suggestion starts (inclusive).
-        Should be derived from the hunk line numbers, and correspond to the 'existing code' snippet above.
-    relevant lines end:
-      type: integer
-      description: |-
-        The relevant line number from a '__new hunk__' section where the suggestion ends (inclusive).
-        Should be derived from the hunk line numbers, and correspond to the 'existing code' snippet above.
-    improved code:
-      type: string
-      description: |-
-        a new code snippet that can be used to replace the relevant lines in '__new hunk__' code.
-        Replacement suggestions should be complete, correctly formatted and indented, and without line numbers.
-```
 
 Example output:
 ```yaml
-Code suggestions:
-- relevant file: |-
+code_suggestions:
+- relevant_file: |-
     src/file1.py
-  suggestion content: |-
+  suggestion_content: |-
     Add a docstring to func1()
-  existing code: |-
+  existing_code: |-
     def func1():
-  relevant lines start: |-
-    12
-  relevant lines end: |-
-    12
-  improved code: |-
+  relevant_lines_start: 12
+  relevant_lines_end: 12
+  improved_code: |-
+    ...
+  label: |-
     ...
-...
 ```
 
 
 Each YAML output MUST be after a newline, indented, with block scalar indicator ('|-').
-Don't repeat the prompt in the answer, and avoid outputting the 'type' and 'description' fields.
 """
 
 user="""PR Info: