Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: allocating connection id on server side #725

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Feb 26, 2024

Conversation

woorui
Copy link
Collaborator

@woorui woorui commented Feb 18, 2024

Description

resolve #710 gracefully.

Impact

The server no longer uses the ID from the client as the storage key. Instead, it now uses an automatically incremented integer as the storage key.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Feb 18, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
yomo ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Feb 21, 2024 6:49am

@woorui woorui self-assigned this Feb 19, 2024
@woorui woorui marked this pull request as ready for review February 19, 2024 10:55
core/connection.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
core/connector.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
core/connector.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
core/connector.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
core/connector.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
woorui and others added 5 commits February 21, 2024 14:49
Co-authored-by: C.C. <fanweixiao@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: C.C. <fanweixiao@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: C.C. <fanweixiao@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: C.C. <fanweixiao@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: C.C. <fanweixiao@gmail.com>
@fanweixiao
Copy link
Member

@wujunzhuo please review this PR.

@fanweixiao fanweixiao merged commit c9a991e into master Feb 26, 2024
5 checks passed
@fanweixiao fanweixiao deleted the feat/server-alloc-id branch February 26, 2024 15:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants