Add ServerSeq into ChangeInfo #179
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes enhance the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
participant Converter
participant Document
Client->>Server: Send Change with clientSeq and serverSeq
Server->>Converter: Convert ChangeID with serverSeq
Converter->>Document: Publish Change with ChangeInfo(clientSeq, serverSeq)
Document->>Client: Emit Change Events with updated ChangeInfo
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #179 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 43.43% 43.43% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 105 105
Lines 18991 19020 +29
==========================================
+ Hits 8249 8261 +12
- Misses 10742 10759 +17 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- Sources/API/Converter.swift (2 hunks)
- Sources/Document/Change/Change.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/Document/Change/ChangeID.swift (3 hunks)
- Sources/Document/DocEvent.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/Document/Document.swift (4 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
Sources/Document/Change/Change.swift (1)
53-53: Ensure the new assignment ofChangeIDinsetActoris intentional and well-documented.Consider adding a comment explaining the reason for this change to aid future maintainers.
Sources/Document/Change/ChangeID.swift (2)
36-40: The addition ofserverSeqin the initializer aligns with the PR's objectives to handle server sequences.
73-74: The updatedsetActormethod now returns a newChangeID, promoting immutability. This is a good practice as it helps prevent unintended side effects.Sources/Document/DocEvent.swift (1)
178-179: The addition ofclientSeqandserverSeqtoChangeInfois crucial for enhanced tracking and synchronization of document changes.Sources/Document/Document.swift (1)
162-164: The inclusion ofclientSeqandserverSeqinChangeInfoduring theupdatemethod ensures that all relevant sequence information is captured, aligning with the PR's objectives for better synchronization.Sources/API/Converter.swift (1)
514-534: The handling ofTreeStyleOperationinfromOperationsis a significant addition. Verify that this new operation type integrates smoothly with existing functionalities.Verification successful
The search results indicate that
TreeStyleOperationis integrated into the following files:
Sources/API/Converter.swiftSources/Document/Operation/TreeSytleOperation.swiftSources/Document/Json/JSONTree.swiftTo ensure proper integration and handling, let's review the relevant code snippets from these files.
The extracted code snippets indicate that
TreeStyleOperationis correctly integrated and handled across the system. Here are the key points:
Sources/API/Converter.swift:
TreeStyleOperationis correctly converted to and from Protobuf format.- The necessary properties and mappings are handled appropriately.
Sources/Document/Operation/TreeSytleOperation.swift:
- The class
TreeStyleOperationis defined with the required properties (parentCreatedAt,executedAt,fromPos,toPos, etc.).- The class represents an operation that modifies the style of a node in the tree.
Sources/Document/Json/JSONTree.swift:
TreeStyleOperationis used in the context of tree styling operations.- The operations for styling and removing styles are correctly implemented and pushed to the context.
Based on the review of the code snippets, the integration and handling of
TreeStyleOperationappear to be correctly implemented.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the handling of `TreeStyleOperation` across the system. # Test: Search for handling of `TreeStyleOperation`. Expect: Proper integration and handling. rg --type swift $'TreeStyleOperation'Length of output: 3174
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Extract relevant code snippets for `TreeStyleOperation` from the identified files. # Extract from `Sources/API/Converter.swift` rg --type swift --context 10 'TreeStyleOperation' Sources/API/Converter.swift # Extract from `Sources/Document/Operation/TreeSytleOperation.swift` rg --type swift --context 10 'TreeStyleOperation' Sources/Document/Operation/TreeSytleOperation.swift # Extract from `Sources/Document/Json/JSONTree.swift` rg --type swift --context 10 'TreeStyleOperation' Sources/Document/Json/JSONTree.swiftLength of output: 7605
| actor: pbChangeID.actorID.toHexString, | ||
| serverSeq: pbChangeID.serverSeq) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The function definition of fromChangeID in Sources/API/Converter.swift includes the new serverSeq parameter, and its usage in fromChanges matches this new signature. However, the test case in Tests/Unit/API/V1/ConverterTests.swift does not include the serverSeq parameter.
- Tests/Unit/API/V1/ConverterTests.swift: Update the test case to include the
serverSeqparameter when callingfromChangeID.
Analysis chain
The addition of serverSeq to fromChangeID enhances change tracking capabilities. Ensure all calls to this function are updated accordingly.
The search results indicate multiple occurrences of fromChangeID in Sources/API/Converter.swift and Tests/Unit/API/V1/ConverterTests.swift. We need to verify that each of these occurrences matches the new function signature, which includes the serverSeq parameter.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `fromChangeID` match the new signature.
# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature.
rg --type swift $'fromChangeID'
Length of output: 419
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all occurrences of `fromChangeID` include the new `serverSeq` parameter.
# Check the specific lines in the files where `fromChangeID` is used.
rg --type swift --context 5 'fromChangeID' Sources/API/Converter.swift Tests/Unit/API/V1/ConverterTests.swift
Length of output: 2640
| /** | ||
| * `getServerSeq` returns the server sequence of this ID. | ||
| */ | ||
| func getServerSeq() -> String { | ||
| if let serverSeq { | ||
| return String(serverSeq) | ||
| } else { | ||
| return "" | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider returning an optional String? from getServerSeq instead of an empty string to allow explicit handling of absent values.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:
Additional documentation:
Checklist:
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
ChangeInfostruct with newclientSeqandserverSeqproperties for more detailed change tracking.Bug Fixes
TreeStyleOperationinstances to ensure accurate creation based on conditions.Refactor
Changestruct to use a method call for setting the actor, improving code clarity.ChangeIDstruct to include a newserverSeqparameter and adjusted methods for better functionality.