Version `GLIBC_2.34' not found.

[omidmousavi]

I got these errors after run spf :

./spf: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by ./spf)
./spf: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found (required by ./spf)

[yorukot]

It looks like you need to install libc.so.6.
Can you try install it?

[omidmousavi]

yes.
the result of sudo apt install libc6 is this:
libc6 is already the newest version (2.31-13+deb11u10).

[yorukot]

I think this seems to be an apt package problem
Maybe you can try it
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux4noobs/comments/15nfcwb/version_glibc_234_not_found_when_using_the/

[omidmousavi]

i tried but dont working... :(

[Zxilly]

Apparently, GitHub Actions' glibc version is too high causing this problem. Building precompiled binaries that link to libc should take this into account.
There are two possible solutions, either compiling under a lower version of glibc, which docker will help with, or using a c compiler that supports setting the glibc version, such as zig cc or something like that

[Zxilly]

If you want to support the major operating systems, it would be a good idea to set it to 2.17, which will support almost all still-active distros. But configuring the environment can be a pain, only centos7 out of the mainstream distros I know of still uses glibc at such a low version. or 2.22/23, which is pre-installed on Ubuntu 16.
Check out https://repology.org/project/glibc/versions for the full list

[Zxilly]

Or, alternatively, opt for a direct static link to musl so that you don't have to think about all this hassle. Static linking to glibc is not recommended for complex reasons, and many good explanations can be found on Google.

[yorukot]

I'm going to close this issue for now, but if there are any more problems, feel free to reopen it.