Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Netscaler multiple partition support #1596

Merged
merged 5 commits into from Mar 4, 2022

Conversation

smallsam
Copy link
Contributor

@smallsam smallsam commented Oct 17, 2018

Pre-Request Checklist

  • Passes rubocop code analysis (try rubocop --auto-correct)
  • Tests added or adapted (try rake test)
  • Changes are reflected in the documentation
  • User-visible changes appended to CHANGELOG.md

Description

Citrix Netscalers have functionality for logical partitioning, where each partition has its own config. This pull request enhances oxidized to check for presence of these additional config partitions and retrieves the configuration from them if present.

It is modeled on the asa model which has similar logical config separation in contexts.

@smallsam smallsam changed the title Netscaler partitions Netscaler multiple partition support Oct 17, 2018
@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Oct 17, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1596 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1596   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.62%   62.62%           
=======================================
  Files          30       30           
  Lines        1493     1493           
=======================================
  Hits          935      935           
  Misses        558      558

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ff5e198...952ead3. Read the comment docs.

@mortzu
Copy link
Collaborator

mortzu commented Dec 29, 2021

Can you fix the conflict

@smallsam
Copy link
Contributor Author

smallsam commented Jan 5, 2022

I've rebased and updated the changelog in line with the new format. I've no longer got access to a netscaler to test this change on, but the rebase should only have impacted the changelog.

@mortzu
Copy link
Collaborator

mortzu commented Jan 26, 2022

Can you fix the conflict again (sorry. We have to change the CHANGELOG to a more flexible variant...)

@mortzu mortzu merged commit ac70a80 into ytti:master Mar 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants