New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Legal entity for karrot.world #606

Open
Sliverriver opened this Issue Sep 1, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@Sliverriver
Copy link

Sliverriver commented Sep 1, 2017

I think it was mentionend somewhere in slack and just want to make an issue for it so that discussions can happen here.

Should there be a legal entity for running the website ?
How would that entity look like?
what would the responsibility be of it ?
which country should it be registered ?

some examples :

  1. A user posts a swastika or other fascist stuff on the website / (or "karrot" (=The fs tool), and another users informs the authorities to sue them. (In germany it is forbidden to share / Post nazi-symbols).
    so the german "verfassungsschutz(Intelligence service) /police" would start an investigation and ask the site for information about that user (e-mail, IP(if stored),etc.)

How should the site owner / legal entity behave ? What would we want/expect ?

  1. maybe some users decide that the foodsaving tool is perfect to run their drug ring on foodsaving.world.
    How should be the behaviour if the site owner is informed by
    a) another user
    b) approached by authorities who would like an undercover operation (i don't even know if i am exaggerating)

  2. A user is unhappy with a group and demands from the siteowner that he intervenes with whatever user is unhappy with. (This would increase with more hierarchichal features on the tool)

  3. copyright content is illegally shared through links in the forums.
    ("Oh you haven't seen this movie/heard the music - here you can download it")

  4. should the "owner" members of the legal entity "Owning" the site be transparent , making them more vulnerable for claims, or even people who would try to push/ influence for certain page changes.

  5. are there insurances for running a website ? i am serious about this question.

just some sorts to get the discussion started.

The more the "site owner" who is running the foodsaving tool karrott is involved in appointing groups or creating them the more he will be involved in whatever happens there.

@nicksellen nicksellen added this to the Discussion (lower priority) milestone Sep 1, 2017

@tiltec

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

tiltec commented Sep 1, 2017

Related thoughts:

This would be the main reason to encourage users to set up their own foodsaving tool instance. Maybe we can simplify it with docker and provide docker hosting services for interested groups?

The foodsaving tool instance on foodsaving.world would just be a demo and would get purged every few months.

@Sliverriver

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link

Sliverriver commented Sep 4, 2017

doesn't solve the issue that you would need one for foodsaving.world.

@tiltec

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

tiltec commented Sep 5, 2017

Ideally, we would legally split operations between "developing karrot" and "hosting an instance on karrot.world". I think the developer organization wouldn't need a legal entity, and the hosting organization would need to get more and more professional with legal structures and everything.
As a developer, I would be more productive to not bother with the latter topics.

@tiltec tiltec changed the title legal entity for foodsaving.world Legal entity for karrot.world Jul 16, 2018

@lwm

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

lwm commented Dec 31, 2018

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment